Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Hydrogel Nanoparticle Harvesting of Plasma or Urine for Detecting Low Abundance Proteins
Published on: August 7, 2014
Screening dipstick urinalysis: a time to change
R E Kaplan1, J E Springate, L G Feld
1Department of Pediatrics, SUNY at Buffalo School of Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences and Children's Hospital, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Insights
Screening asymptomatic children with multiple dipstick urinalyses is expensive. A single urinalysis at school entry is proposed as a more cost-effective approach for pediatric kidney health.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Clinical Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- Diagnostic Screening
Background:
- Dipstick urinalysis is a common screening tool in pediatric primary care.
- Current guidelines often recommend multiple screenings for asymptomatic children.
- The cost-effectiveness of these repeated screenings is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the minimal cost of screening dipstick urinalyses in a hypothetical cohort of 2000 asymptomatic pediatric patients.
- To evaluate the cost implications of repeated urinalysis screenings versus a single screening.
Main Methods:
- A hypothetical cohort of 2000 asymptomatic pediatric patients was modeled.
- Costs were calculated based on private practitioner charges for in-office tests, commercial laboratory fees, and specialist consultations.
- Data from published studies were incorporated into the cost analysis.
Main Results:
- An initial abnormal urinalysis was predicted in 9% of patients, with persistent abnormalities in only 1.5%.
- The majority of initial abnormalities (84%) were transient or false positives.
- The minimal cost for four recommended screenings ranged from $20,088 to $25,900, significantly higher than a single screening ($1,290).
Conclusions:
- Multiple screening dipstick urinalyses in asymptomatic pediatric patients are excessively costly.
- Discontinuation of multiple screenings is recommended.
- A single dipstick urinalysis at school entry (ages 5-6) using a first morning void sample is proposed as a more efficient alternative.
Objective:
This study attempted to determine the minimal cost of screening dipstick urinalyses in a hypothetical cohort of 2000 asymptomatic pediatric patients in a primary care setting.
Methodology:
The minimal cost utilizing a private practitioner in an urban or suburban group pediatric setting was calculated. Costs were determined by using current charges for supplies ordered to perform tests in the office, charges for tests performed by a commercial laboratory, and the cost of an initial evaluation by a pediatric nephrologist. Data from published studies were also utilized.
Results:
Nine percent (179/2000) of patients were calculated to have an initial abnormal urinalysis. Upon retesting only 1.5% (29/2000) of patients were calculated to have a persistent abnormality. The calculated rate of a false positive/transient abnormality for all patients in the hypothetical cohort of 2000 asymptomatic pediatric patients was 84% (150/179). The calculated minimal cost for the outpatient evaluation of 2000 asymptomatic pediatric patients by dipstick urinalyses ranged between $5022 to $6475. The range depends on whether 50% versus 100% of patients with a repeat abnormal dipstick urinalysis were referred to a pediatric nephrologist for further evaluation. The calculated cost was $1290 to initially screen all 2000 patients with a dipstick urinalysis or 65 cents per patient. The calculated cost to evaluate the 29 patients with any persistent abnormality on repeat dipstick urinalysis was $3732 to $5185 or $129 to $179 per patient. This is the calculated cost for a single screening of 2000 asymptomatic pediatric patients. The calculated cost for four multiple screening urinalyses as currently recommended is $20 088 to $25 900. Additionally, these are only minimal initial calculated costs. Costs of any renal imagining or function studies ordered by the pediatric nephrologist or the pediatrician pursuing a further evaluation on his/her own were not included.
Conclusion:
Multiple screening dipstick urinalyses in asymptomatic pediatric patients are costly and should be discontinued. In their place, we propose that a single screening dipstick urinalysis be obtained at school entry age, between 5 and 6 years old, in all asymptomatic children. The sample should be a first morning void.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System II: Inspection and Palpation
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

