Related Experiment Videos
Glycosylation differences between a cystic fibrosis and rescued airway cell line are not CFTR dependent
X Jiang1, W G Hill, J M Pilewski
1Renal-Electrolyte Division Laboratory of Epithelial Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Abstract:
Altered glycosylation of mucus and membrane glycoconjugates could explain reported differences in binding of bacterial pathogens to cystic fibrosis (CF) versus normal tissue. However, because bacteria can alter cell surface glycoconjugates, it is not possible to assess the role of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulators (CFTR) in glycosylation in these studies. To address this issue, we have developed quantitative lectin binding assays to compare cell surface glycosylation in well-matched immortalized CF cells and rescued cell lines. The CF airway bronchial epithelial cell line IB3-1 consistently bound more peanut agglutinin (PNA) than its clonal derivative S9, which stably expresses functional wild-type CFTR. Pretreatment with neuraminidase increased PNA binding and abolished the difference between the two cell lines. However, infection of the IB3-1 cells with a replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus encoding CFTR restored CFTR function but did not alter PNA binding to cells. In contrast, treatment with the weak base ammonium chloride increased PNA binding to both cell lines as expected. Our data show that even clonally related CF and rescued cells can exhibit significant differences in carbohydrate processing. Although the differences that we found are consistent with the proposed role for CFTR in modulating intraorganellar pH, our data strongly suggest that they are CFTR independent. These studies add a cautionary note to the interpretation of differences in glycosylation between CF and normal primary tissues and immortalized cells.
Insights
Altered cell surface glycosylation in cystic fibrosis (CF) is not solely dependent on CFTR function. This study suggests CFTR-independent mechanisms influence carbohydrate processing in CF cells, cautioning against direct CFTR role attribution.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Glycobiology
- Cystic Fibrosis Research
Background:
- Altered glycosylation in cystic fibrosis (CF) tissues may explain pathogen binding differences.
- Previous studies are confounded by bacterial modulation of cell surface glycoconjugates.
- Assessing the role of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in glycosylation requires controlled cellular models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate cell surface glycosylation differences between CF and CFTR-rescued cells.
- To determine if CFTR directly influences carbohydrate processing and lectin binding.
- To clarify the role of CFTR in observed glycosylation alterations in CF.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative lectin binding assays using peanut agglutinin (PNA).
- Comparison of immortalized CF (IB3-1) and CFTR-rescued (S9) bronchial epithelial cell lines.
- Treatment with neuraminidase, ammonium chloride, and adenovirus-mediated CFTR expression.
Main Results:
- IB3-1 cells showed higher PNA binding than S9 cells.
- Neuraminidase treatment equalized PNA binding, suggesting sialic acid involvement.
- Adenovirus-mediated CFTR expression in IB3-1 cells did not alter PNA binding.
- Ammonium chloride increased PNA binding in both cell lines.
Conclusions:
- Significant differences in carbohydrate processing exist between clonally related CF and CFTR-rescued cells.
- Observed glycosylation differences are likely independent of CFTR function.
- Findings caution against attributing glycosylation alterations solely to CFTR in CF research.