Assessing residual leukaemia

For the great majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome is a specific marker of the malignant clone. The standard method to assess the quality of remission in these patients is cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow derived metaphases. However, the molecular definition of the t(9;22) and its consequences has enabled other tests to be developed that can specifically detect CML cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses chromosomes to detect either the juxtaposition of BCR and ABL sequences or the disruption of these genes; Southern blotting analyses genomic DNA to determine whether the BCR gene is rearranged; reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses RNA to determine the presence or absence of BCR-ABL transcripts; Western blotting analyses cell lysates to determine the presence or absence of BCR-ABL protein. Each of these techniques has particular advantages and pitfalls but in general they may be used to replace or at least to reduce the frequency of conventional cytogenetic analysis. Partly because of economic factors and the lack of standardization or effective quality control, these assays are still largely restricted to research laboratories. The sensitivity with which residual leukaemia can be detected suggests that FISH, Southern blotting and Western blotting are likely to be most useful in assessing patient response to interferon-alpha or other forms of treatment that typically induce partial remission. RT-PCR is by far the most sensitive assay and is probably most appropriate for monitoring patients who are in complete remission.