Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fast spin echo vs conventional spin echo in cervical spine imaging

A R Gillams1, J A Soto, A P Carter

  • 1Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical School and Boston City Hospital Imaging Foundation, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

European Radiology
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From animal studies into clinical trials: the relevance of animal models to develop vaccines and therapies to reduce disease severity and prevent hRSV infection.

Expert opinion on drug discovery·2022
Same author

Purification and characterization of saxitoxin from Mytilus chilensis of southern Chile.

Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology·2015
Same author

[Intestinal and mesenteric trauma].

Radiologia·2011
Same author

Unilateral double ureter; unilateral pyelo-ureteral splitting.

Archivos de pediatria del Uruguay·2010
Same author

Unilateral double ureter.

Archivos argentinos de pediatria·2010
Same author

Five-year survival in 309 patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with radiofrequency ablation.

European radiology·2009

Fast-spin-echo (FSE) magnetic resonance imaging is preferred over conventional spin echo (CSE) for cervical spine scans. FSE reduces scan time, improves lesion detection, and offers higher diagnostic confidence, making it superior for cervical spine evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Neuroimaging
  • Spinal Imaging

Background:

  • Fast-spin-echo (FSE) imaging offers reduced acquisition times compared to conventional spin echo (CSE).
  • However, FSE has potential weaknesses including phase-encoded blurring, truncation artifacts, bright fat signal, reduced magnetic susceptibility, and increased motion artifacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively and blindly compare the efficacy of FSE and CSE sequences in cervical spine imaging.
  • To evaluate diagnostic performance, artifact levels, and image quality between the two MRI techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, blinded comparative study of FSE and CSE was conducted on 43 patients (19 males, 24 females; mean age 45 years).
  • Imaging was performed at 1.5 T and 0.5 T using specific TR/TE parameters for both sequences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two neuroradiologists assessed images for pathology, artifacts, disc signal, thecal sac compression, and overall image quality.

    • Main Results:

    • Fast-spin-echo (FSE) imaging is preferred over conventional spin echo (CSE) for cervical spine scans.
    • FSE demonstrated higher diagnostic confidence (mean 1.1 vs. 1.8 for CSE) and missed fewer cord lesions (20% missed by CSE).
    • CSE appeared to exaggerate the degree of stenosis in moderate/severe cases, while FSE provided more accurate assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • Fast-spin-echo (FSE) imaging is the preferred sequence for cervical spine MRI due to its diagnostic advantages.
    • FSE offers improved detection of cord lesions and more accurate assessment of spinal stenosis compared to CSE.
    • The time saved with FSE can be utilized to enhance image resolution and signal averaging, further improving diagnostic utility.