Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Intention-to-treat analysis in randomized trials: who gets counted?
1Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
Choosing the right analysis strategy for randomized clinical trials is crucial, especially when protocol deviations occur. Intention-to-treat analysis offers a valuable perspective for assessing treatment policies.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Protocol deviations are common in randomized clinical trials.
- Selecting appropriate analysis strategies is critical for valid interpretation of trial results.
- Bias can arise from different analytic approaches to efficacy and effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the rationale and implications of analysis strategy selection in randomized clinical trials concerning protocol deviations.
- To explore conceptual and methodologic approaches to bias in clinical efficacy and effectiveness assessment.
- To highlight the impact of different analytic strategies, particularly intention-to-treat analysis.
Main Methods:
- Discussion of conceptual and methodologic approaches to clinical trial analysis.
- Examination of biases related to protocol deviations.
- Illustrative examples of consequences from various analytic strategies.
Main Results:
- Intention-to-treat analysis addresses the policy question of treatment adoption, which can be more relevant than direct treatment comparison.
- Different analytic strategies have varying appropriateness depending on the intended audience.
- The choice of analysis strategy significantly impacts the interpretation of clinical trial outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The selection of analysis strategies in randomized clinical trials must carefully consider protocol deviations.
- Intention-to-treat analysis provides a robust framework for evaluating treatment policies.
- Tailoring analytic strategies to the intended audience ensures appropriate interpretation and application of trial findings.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:36The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Censoring Survival Data