[Comparison of psychodiagnostic methods for dementia and deterioration]

Several cognitive impairment/dementia diagnostic methods were examined concerning their results: (a) in the differentiation of accidental and pathological ability changes; (b) in the demonstration/exclusion of cognitive impairment; and (c) the degree of dementia. Sixty-five patients suffering from brain damage were examined with five accepted methods of diagnosing dementia (Syndrom-kurztest, KAI-MWT-Methode, Demenz-Test, Mini-Mental-Status-Test, Wurzer-Methode) and a comprehensive performance test battery as an external criterion for valid determination of the degree of dementia and definite differentiation of accidental and pathological performance changes. The five methods of diagnosing dementia differ appreciably in determining the degree of severity (r = 0.44). They are effective in registering accidental performance changes in comparison with the outer criterion, but pathological changes are inaccurately registered (hit rate 88%/53%); the results concerning the degree of cognitive impairment are identical: between 25 and 43% (r = 0.43). High rates (58%) of false-negative diagnoses are especially apparent in the range of slight and intermediate cognitive impairment. The methods examined are only useful for the demonstration and not for the exclusion of severe cognitive impairment (dementia) and in no circumstances for the registration of slight/intermediate cognitive impairment. Valid diagnosis of cognitive impairment/dementia necessitates the use of test batteries that differentiate functions including the premorbid performance level.