Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026
The Optokinetic Response as a Quantitative Measure of Visual Acuity in Zebrafish
Published on: October 9, 2013
Comparison of measures of visual acuity in infants: Teller acuity cards and sweep visual evoked potentials
P M Riddell1, B Ladenheim, J Mast
1Infant Study Center, Brooklyn College of CUNY, USA.
Insights
This study found that sweep visual evoked potentials (sVEP) generally yield higher acuity measurements than Teller acuity cards (TAC) in infants. However, both methods showed comparable developmental trends across different testing centers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric ophthalmology
- Visual development research
- Infant visual acuity assessment
Background:
- Accurate measurement of infant visual acuity is crucial for early detection of visual impairments.
- Teller acuity cards (TAC) and sweep visual evoked potentials (sVEP) are common methods for assessing infant vision.
- Understanding the developmental trajectories measured by different methods is important for clinical interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare visual acuity development in infants using TAC and sVEP within the same testing session.
- To investigate whether different testing centers yield comparable developmental time courses for visual acuity.
- To assess the relationship between TAC and sVEP acuity measurements across different infant ages.
Main Methods:
- Forty-eight infants were tested in two separate research centers.
- Standard procedures for TAC were employed for visual acuity assessment.
- sVEP acuity was determined by analyzing amplitude response curves to extrapolate acuity estimates.
Main Results:
- sVEP generally provided higher acuity values compared to TAC.
- The rate of visual acuity development was steeper for TAC, starting from a lower baseline.
- The ratio of sVEP to TAC acuity decreased exponentially with age, stabilizing around 1.44 by 6 months.
Conclusions:
- Infant visual acuity measurements were consistent across the two testing centers, regardless of the method used.
- Findings suggest that comparisons of acuity data obtained using variations of TAC and sVEP across different centers are feasible.
- The study highlights the distinct but comparable developmental patterns of visual acuity measured by TAC and sVEP.
Purpose:
This study compares the development of acuity in the same infants during one testing session using Teller acuity cards (TAC) and sweep visual evoked potentials (sVEP). We asked whether different testing methods in two centers would produce different developmental time courses.
Methods:
Forty-eight infants were tested in two centers. The standard procedure for TAC was used. For sVEP acuity, the amplitude response curve derived from time-locked cortical activity was used to extrapolate to zero response, giving an acuity estimate for each infant.
Results:
sVEP acuity was generally higher than TAC acuity. The rate of development was steeper for TAC than sVEP acuity with TAC starting at a much lower level. The ratio of sVEP to TAC acuity decreased exponentially with age reaching an asymptote of about 1.44 at 6 months.
Conclusions:
Results were indistinguishable between centers suggesting that comparison of acuity measures obtained using variations of these methods across centers is possible.
