Related Experiment Videos
Left ventricular mass assessed by three-dimensional echocardiography using rotational acquisition
O Rodevand1, R Bjornerheim, O Kolbjornsen
1Medical Department B, National Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway.
Clinical Cardiology
|December 31, 1997
Summary
Three-dimensional (3-D) echocardiography shows improved reproducibility for left ventricular (LV) mass measurement compared to traditional 2-D methods. However, the "parasternal" 3-D approach offers better accuracy and reproducibility than the apical 3-D technique for LV mass estimation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Structure Measurement
Background:
- Two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography exhibits insufficient reproducibility for individual left ventricular (LV) mass assessments.
- Accurate LV mass quantification is crucial for diagnosing and managing various cardiac conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a novel three-dimensional (3-D) echocardiographic method for LV mass determination.
- To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of the new 3-D method against established 2-D echocardiographic techniques.
Main Methods:
- Porcine left ventricles (n=15) were measured using a multiplane 3-D echocardiography method with probe rotation.
- Measurements were performed using both "parasternal" and apical views for the 3-D technique.
- Comparison included biplane truncated ellipsoid, area-length, and modified cube formula 2-D methods.
Main Results:
- All methods showed minimal systematic deviation (<5.3%) from true mass.
- The "parasternal" 3-D method demonstrated superior accuracy (7.7%) and interobserver reproducibility (4.7%) compared to apical 3-D and 2-D methods.
- Apical 3-D echocardiography showed lower accuracy (13.6%) and reproducibility (8.8%) than the "parasternal" 3-D approach.
Conclusions:
- The "parasternal" 3-D echocardiography method offers enhanced accuracy and reproducibility for in vitro LV mass estimation.
- Apical 3-D echocardiography did not outperform simpler 2-D methods in terms of accuracy and reproducibility.
- While the "parasternal" 3-D method improves reproducibility over 2-D techniques, it requires more time.