Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
Fate of intramural hematoma of the aorta: CT evaluation
E Sueyoshi1, Y Matsuoka, I Sakamoto
1Department of Radiology, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Japan.
Insights
Intramural aortic hematomas typically shrink, but can progress to aneurysm or dissection. Ulcer-like projections indicate early complications, while fusiform aneurysms may develop later. Close follow-up is essential.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular imaging
- Aortic pathology
Background:
- Intramural hematoma (IMH) is a variant of aortic dissection.
- Understanding IMH progression is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the natural history and outcomes of aortic intramural hematoma.
- To identify imaging predictors of IMH evolution.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of CT and MR imaging in 32 patients with IMH.
- Regular follow-up imaging to assess changes and complications.
Main Results:
- All IMHs showed size reduction during follow-up.
- Ulcer-like projections (ULPs) were identified in 20 patients.
- ULPs progressed to saccular aneurysms in 12 patients; fusiform aneurysms developed in 6 without ULPs; 2 cases progressed to aortic dissection.
Conclusions:
- IMH itself usually resolves, but complications like aneurysms and dissection can occur.
- Saccular aneurysms from ULPs are early complications; fusiform aneurysms are late complications.
- Predicting IMH fate solely on initial imaging is challenging, necessitating diligent follow-up.
Purpose:
Our goal was to investigate the fate of intramural hematoma of the aorta.
Method:
In 32 patients with intramural hematoma of the aorta, we reviewed CT (n = 32) and MR (n = 22) findings. The diagnosis was established by CT, and regular follow-up studies were performed.
Results:
All intramural hematomas decreased in size. Ulcer-like projections (ULPs) were identified at the initial study in 6 patients and during the follow-up period in 14 patients. The ULPs progressed to saccular aneurysm in 12 patients (mean 47.0 days), while fusiform aneurysm developed in 6 patients (mean 347.7 days) without ULP. In two patients, the affected aorta progressed to overt aortic dissection.
Conclusion:
Intramural hematoma itself usually decreases in size. However, the affected aorta can progress to aneurysm or overt aortic dissection. Development of saccular aneurysm from ULPs can be considered an early complication. In cases without ULP, fusiform aneurysm may develop as a late complication. All intramural hematomas need to be followed since it seems to be difficult to predict the exact fate of intramural hematoma from the initial imaging findings.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

