Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in children

S A Hay1

  • 1Pediatric Surgery Unit, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Pediatric Surgery International
|January 31, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endoscopic implantation and patency evaluation of lumboperitoneal shunt: an innovative technique.

Surgical endoscopy·2004
Same author

Neonatal jaundice: the role of laparoscopy.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2000
Same author

Laparoscopic classification and treatment of the impalpable testis.

Pediatric surgery international·2000
Same author

Idiopathic intussusception: the role of laparoscopy.

Journal of pediatric surgery·1999
Same journal

Should pull through be offered to patients with cloacal exstrophy?

Pediatric surgery international·2026
Same journal

Potential benefits of simultaneous anorecto-vaginoplasty for patients with persistent cloaca: insights from a nationwide survey in Japan.

Pediatric surgery international·2026
Same journal

Elective interval appendectomy following non-operative management for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a feasible same-day discharge strategy in children.

Pediatric surgery international·2026
Same journal

Predictors of organ injury in pediatric bicycle handlebar trauma: a single-center retrospective study.

Pediatric surgery international·2026
Same journal

Can urinary exosomal lncRNAs HOTAIR and MALAT1 predict surgical need and outcomes in unilateral antenatal hydronephrosis?

Pediatric surgery international·2026
Same journal

An interim analysis of the standard care (stoma bags) and double-diapers in pediatric patients with stomas at a tertiary hospital in South Africa.

Pediatric surgery international·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) offers advantages over conventional appendectomy (CA) in children, including shorter hospital stays and faster recovery. This minimally invasive approach also resulted in fewer wound complications and better cosmetic outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in children.
  • Conventional appendectomy (CA) has been the standard treatment.
  • Recurrent subacute appendicitis also requires surgical intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus conventional appendectomy (CA) in pediatric patients.
  • To evaluate differences in hospitalization time, recovery, and complications between the two surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study over 6 months involving 48 children undergoing CA and 34 children undergoing LA.
  • Patients ranged from 4 to 12 years old with acute or recurrent subacute appendicitis.
  • Key outcomes measured included operative time, hospitalization duration, return to normal activity, wound complications, and cosmetic results.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) had a longer operative time (76 min) compared to conventional appendectomy (CA) (50 min).
  • 95% of LA patients had less than 2 days' hospitalization versus 45% for CA.
  • LA patients returned to normal activity in an average of 7 days, compared to 12 days for CA (P < 0.001).
  • LA resulted in fewer wound complications and superior cosmetic outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a safe and effective alternative for pediatric appendicitis.
  • LA offers significant advantages including shorter hospitalization, earlier ambulation, and improved cosmetic results compared to CA.
  • The exploratory nature of LA may also be beneficial in certain cases.