Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A prospective, randomized study addressing the need for physical simulation following virtual simulation

R K Valicenti1, F M Waterman, B W Corn

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|December 10, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer.

ESMO open·2023
Same author

Innovation at life's end: a moment for hope.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2021
Same author

Prophylactic irradiation to the contralateral breast for BRCA mutation carriers with early-stage breast cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2018
Same author

Quantitative verification of <sup>192</sup> Ir PDR and HDR source structure by pin-hole autoradiography.

Medical physics·2018
Same author

Hypofractionated adjuvant radiation therapy of soft-tissue sarcoma achieves excellent results in elderly patients.

The British journal of radiology·2013
Same author

Patterns of missing mini mental status exam (MMSE) in radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) brain cancer trials.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2011
Same journal

Single Percussive Ventilation Breath-hold Imaging and Delivery in Lung Tumor Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Initial Observations From a Prospective Clinical Trial.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Proton beam therapy in nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Outcome, prognostic factors and the effect of timing of radiation therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Hypofractionated Proton Reirradiation for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Clinical and Dosimetric Outcomes from a Large Single Institution Series.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Gastrointestinal Motility-Induced Interplay in Pancreas Proton Therapy: Motion Simulation and Dosimetric Impact.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Intra-fractional Voxel-wise Anatomical Motion Tracking Guided by Multimodal Respiratory Surrogates in Radiotherapy: Framework Development and Multi-Center Validation.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

A Gaussian-based planning approach for robust dose-escalated stereotactic body proton therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
See all related articles

Physical simulation may not be necessary after CT virtual simulation for prostate cancer radiation therapy. Port filming alone is sufficient for accurate treatment implementation, potentially eliminating the need for physical simulation.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Planning

Background:

  • Conventional physical simulation is often used alongside virtual simulation for radiotherapy planning.
  • The necessity of physical simulation after virtual simulation requires further investigation to optimize treatment delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the necessity of physical simulation in addition to virtual simulation for conformal four-field radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients.
  • To determine if physical simulation improves the accuracy of treatment plan implementation compared to virtual simulation alone.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective randomized study involving 75 prostate cancer patients undergoing conformal four-field radiation therapy planning.
  • Patients were randomized to either physical simulation with port filming or virtual simulation with port filming alone.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Treatment setup accuracy was assessed by comparing simulator radiographs/port films to digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs).

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant reduction in treatment setup error (>5 mm) was observed in patients who underwent physical simulation after virtual simulation.
    • No patients required resimulation, and there were no significant differences in beam aperture changes between the groups.
    • Port filming alone proved sufficient for accurate implementation of the treatment plan.

    Conclusions:

    • Physical simulation may be redundant when virtual simulation is utilized for CT-based radiotherapy planning.
    • Eliminating physical simulation can streamline the planning process without compromising the precision of conformal four-field techniques.
    • Port filming is adequate for ensuring precise and reliable execution of radiation therapy plans post-virtual simulation.