Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A modified step test based on a function of subjects' stature

C D Ashley¹, J F Smith, P D Reneau

¹University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA. ashley@typhoon.coedu.usf.edu

Perceptual and Motor Skills

|December 17, 1997

Summary

Step tests using subject stature do not improve predictions of maximal aerobic capacity. Standardized step heights are as effective as personalized heights for assessing fitness levels.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Publisher Correction: The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nuclei.

Nature communications·2020

Same author

Addendum: The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nuclei.

Nature communications·2020

Same author

First Exploration of Neutron Shell Structure below Lead and beyond N=126.

Physical review letters·2020

Same author

Evolution of Octupole Deformation in Radium Nuclei from Coulomb Excitation of Radioactive ^{222}Ra and ^{228}Ra Beams.

Physical review letters·2020

Same author

Mechanisms Suppressing Superheavy Element Yields in Cold Fusion Reactions.

Physical review letters·2019

Same author

The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nuclei.

Nature communications·2019

Area of Science:

Exercise Physiology
Sports Science
Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Background:

Submaximal step tests are common tools for estimating maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max).
Standardized step heights may not account for individual biomechanical differences, potentially affecting test accuracy.
Personalized step heights, based on individual stature, have been proposed to enhance prediction accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the predictive accuracy of a modified Queens College step test using personalized step height against the standard Queens College step test.
To determine if adjusting step height to individual leg length improves the estimation of maximal aerobic capacity.

Main Methods:

Eighteen women participated in the study.
They completed both the standard Queens College step test and a modified version with a personalized step height (bench height matched foot at 90-degree knee flexion).
Recovery heart rate and correlations with maximal aerobic capacity were analyzed for both tests.

Main Results:

The modified step test resulted in a significantly lower recovery heart rate (p < .05).
Both tests showed moderate correlations between maximal aerobic capacity and recovery heart rate (r = -0.80 and -0.75).
Personalized step height did not yield significantly more accurate predictions of maximal aerobic capacity.

Conclusions:

Step tests based on individual stature do not offer superior prediction of maximal aerobic capacity compared to standardized step heights.
Standardized step tests remain a valid and practical method for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness.
Further research may explore other modifications to optimize submaximal step test accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos