An informational versus monetary incentive in increasing physicians' response rates

A N Easton1, J H Price, S K Telljohann

  • 1University of Toledo, Department of Health Promotion, Ohio 43606, USA.

Psychological Reports
|December 24, 1997
PubMed

Insights

A $1.00 monetary incentive significantly increased cancer prevention survey return rates among pediatricians compared to an informational booklet. This finding aids in optimizing physician survey response strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Public health surveys

Background:

  • Physician participation is crucial for public health research.
  • Low survey response rates can bias study findings.
  • Effective recruitment strategies are needed to improve pediatrician engagement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of a monetary incentive versus an informational booklet on pediatrician survey return rates.
  • To identify optimal strategies for increasing physician participation in cancer prevention research.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial was conducted with three waves of mailings.
  • Pediatricians were randomly assigned to receive either an informational booklet or a $1.00 monetary incentive with their survey.
  • Survey return rates were compared between the two groups.

Main Results:

  • The group receiving the $1.00 incentive had a return rate of 79% (227/300).
  • The group receiving the informational booklet had a return rate of 64% (189/300).
  • The monetary incentive demonstrated a statistically significant increase in survey returns.

Conclusions:

  • A $1.00 monetary incentive is more effective than an informational booklet for improving cancer prevention survey return rates among pediatricians.
  • Monetary incentives represent a viable strategy to enhance physician participation in health research.
  • Future research should explore cost-effectiveness and optimal incentive levels.

Related Concept Videos

The Placebo Effect01:54

The Placebo Effect

The placebo effect occurs when people's expectations or beliefs influence or determine their experience in a given situation. In other words, simply expecting something to happen can actually make it happen.
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview01:03

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy01:22

Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

The potency of a drug is the measure of its ability to produce a biological response and can be compared by looking at the half-maximum effective concentration or EC50 values of different drugs. A lower EC50 value indicates higher potency of the drug. In the dose–response curve of two antihypertensive drugs, candesartan and irbesartan, a significant difference is observed in their EC50 values. A lower EC50 value for candesartan indicates that it is more potent than irbesartan, as it produces...