Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer review groups: problems and solutions

J Beatson, B Knothe

    The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
    |December 24, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Group peer review: a questionnaire-based survey.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·1996
    Same author

    Group peer review in psychiatry: the relationship to quality improvement and quality care.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·1996
    Same author

    Effects of lead and hyperthermia on prenatal brain growth of guinea pigs.

    Teratology·1984
    Same author

    Retardation of brain growth of guinea pigs by hyperthermia: effect of varying intervals between successive exposures.

    Teratology·1984
    Same journal

    Cardiometabolic screening, elevated results and clinical follow-up actions in Ma-ori and non-Ma-ori with psychosis in Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Author reply to Letter to the Editor regarding 'Middle childhood profiles of social-emotional competencies and difficulties differentiate risk of health service presentations with adolescent mental disorders'.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Letter to the Editor regarding 'Middle childhood profiles of social-emotional competencies and difficulties differentiate risk of health service presentations with adolescent mental disorders'.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Diagnostic complexity and comorbidity: Implications for identification, outcomes, health care and involuntary treatment.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Defining and measuring psychosocial disability in Australia: Assessment of national surveys and administrative datasets.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Academic performance in children of mothers with perinatal depressive disorder.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    See all related articles

    This study outlines principles for managing common issues in psychiatric peer review groups, such as difficult members or disagreements. A workshop format successfully resolved problems not easily addressed in real peer review settings.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Professional Development

    Background:

    • Peer review groups are essential for psychiatric practice.
    • Challenges within these groups can hinder their effectiveness.
    • Existing research highlights several common peer review problems.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and define principles for addressing problems in psychiatric peer review groups.
    • To develop practical solutions for common peer review challenges.

    Main Methods:

    • A workshop format was employed using role-playing scenarios.
    • Psychiatrists enacted specific problems encountered in peer review.
    • Proceedings were recorded via notes or videotapes for analysis.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Principles were established for managing five key issues: dominating members, disruptive behavior, inadequate treatment, boundary transgressions, and case management disagreements.
  • Role-playing effectively simulated real-world peer review problems.

    • Conclusions:

    • The workshop format facilitated the exploration and resolution of peer review group problems.
    • This approach offers a viable method for improving peer review group functioning and addressing persistent issues.