Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Antiseptic effects at injection sites

T Arata1, M Kamitani, T Miyai

  • 1Surgical Center, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Augmentation of retinoic acid-induced granulocytic differentiation in HL-60 leukemia cells by serine/threonine protein phosphatase inhibitors.

FEBS letters·1992
Same author

Expression and regulation of the leukemia inhibitory factor/D factor gene in human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 infected T-cell lines.

Cancer research·1992
Same author

[Clinical study on cefprozil fine granules].

The Japanese journal of antibiotics·1992
Same author

Immunohistochemical localization of hepatocyte growth factor protein in pancreas islet A-cells of man and rats.

Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann·1992
Same author

Effects of vagal stimulation on cesium-induced early afterdepolarizations and ventricular arrhythmias in rabbits.

Circulation·1992
Same author

Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Nature·1992

Povidone-iodine (PVP-I) ethanol and chlorhexidine (CH) ethanol effectively reduce bacteria at injection sites. PVP-I ethanol showed slightly better results in reducing bacterial counts, crucial for preventing injection site infections.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Disease Prevention
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Antisepsis protocols for injection sites are not well-documented in existing literature.
  • Commonly used antiseptics for operative fields include povidone-iodine (PVP-I) ethanol and chlorhexidine (CH) ethanol.
  • Effective skin antisepsis is vital for preventing infections associated with invasive procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) ethanol and chlorhexidine (CH) ethanol for injection site antisepsis.
  • To evaluate the bacteria reduction rate and reduction factor (RF) of these two antiseptic agents.
  • To determine the optimal antiseptic for minimizing microbial load on skin prior to injections.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study evaluating PVP-I ethanol and CH ethanol for injection site antisepsis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bacterial specimens collected using the cylinder scrub method before and after disinfection.
  • Quantification of bacteria reduction rate and reduction factor (RF) to assess antiseptic efficacy.

    • Main Results:

    • PVP-I ethanol achieved a bacteria reduction rate of 95.1 +/- 11.2% and an RF of 2.1 +/- 0.9%.
    • CH ethanol achieved a bacteria reduction rate of 93.5 +/- 9.3% and an RF of 1.8 +/- 0.9%.
    • While no statistically significant difference in bactericidal activity was observed due to individual variations, PVP-I ethanol demonstrated slightly superior outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Both PVP-I ethanol and CH ethanol are effective in reducing indigenous skin bacteria at injection sites.
    • PVP-I ethanol exhibited marginally better performance in reducing bacterial counts.
    • Minimizing bacterial load through effective antisepsis is critical for preventing injection site infections, even if complete eradication is not feasible.