Two roads to coma: the Scottish hypothesis

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
08:29

Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans

Published on: December 18, 2016

F R Freemon

    Medical Hypotheses
    |May 1, 1976
    PubMed

    More Related Videos

    SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients11:05

    SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

    Published on: February 6, 2021

    Cerebral Ischemic Coma Model Induced by Modified Four-Vessel Occlusion03:37

    Cerebral Ischemic Coma Model Induced by Modified Four-Vessel Occlusion

    Published on: July 5, 2024

    Related Concept Videos

    Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

    Null and Alternative Hypotheses

    The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
    The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
    The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
    Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

    Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

    The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
    There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
    Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

    Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

    The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
    Causality in Epidemiology01:21

    Causality in Epidemiology

    Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
    Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

    Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

    The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples: