Evaluation of different protocols for prostaglandin synchronization to improve reproductive performance in dairy...

The objective of this study was to evaluate different PGF2 alpha protocols against control protocols for herds with estrus detection efficiencies of 35, 55, and 75% using modeling and simulation: 1) PGF2 alpha treatments based on the presence of a corpus luteum diagnosed by rectal palpation, 2) PGF2 alpha treatments based on the presence of a corpus luteum diagnosed by an on-farm milk progesterone enzyme immunoassay, and 3) PGF2 alpha treatments based on a 14-d fixed treatment schedule without prior screening for ovarian status. After the start of each protocol, estrus detection efficiency was 75% for 7 d after treatment and 35 or 0% for the following week. For the third protocol, an additional modification at estrus detection efficiencies of 85 and 55%, respectively, in the 1st and 2nd wk after treatment was evaluated to establish a protocol for best case assumptions. All protocols improved reproductive performance relative to that of controls with estrus detection efficiencies of 35 and 55%. The mean number of days open was reduced from 124.3 d in the control herd to 95.9, 95.0, and 92.7 for the protocols based on rectal palpation, milk progesterone test, and the fixed treatment schedule, respectively. The protocols based on a fixed treatment schedule were superior to protocols based on rectal palpation and on-farm milk progesterone tests and resulted in better reproductive performance and a higher increase in net return per cow per year. Relative to a control herd with an estrus detection efficiency of 55%, it was cost effective to spend up to $10 per dose of PGF2 alpha, $9 per milk progesterone test, and $6 per rectal palpation.