Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpreting health outcomes

H T Davies1, I K Crombie

  • 1Department of Management, University of St Andrews, UK.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Measuring healthcare outcomes is crucial for patients and providers, but routine data presents significant challenges. Interpreting these outcomes requires careful consideration of limitations to avoid misleading conclusions about healthcare quality.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Weight loss interventions in young people (18 to 25 year olds): a systematic review.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2009
Same author

A randomized comparative crossover study to assess the affect on circuit life of varying pre-dilution volume associated with CVVH and CVVHDF.

The International journal of artificial organs·2008
Same author

The photocarcinogenic risk of narrowband UVB (TL-01) phototherapy: early follow-up data.

The British journal of dermatology·2005
Same author

Who takes alcohol prior to suicide?

Journal of clinical forensic medicine·2004
Same author

Partnerships with health and private voluntary organizations: what are the issues for health authorities and boards?

Public health·2003
Same author

Improving care or professional advantage? What makes clinicians do audit and how well do they fare?

Health bulletin·2003

Area of Science:

  • Health services research
  • Medical informatics
  • Public health policy

Background:

  • Patient and healthcare professional focus on treatment outcomes is increasing.
  • There is a growing emphasis on 'health gain' in healthcare management and policy.
  • Outcomes monitoring is gaining public and political traction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the interpretation of healthcare outcomes data.
  • To highlight the limitations and potential biases in routine outcomes measurement.
  • To provide a balanced perspective on the utility of outcomes monitoring in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing literature on healthcare outcomes measurement.
  • Discussion of statistical, methodological, and technological challenges.
  • Examination of biases inherent in routine data collection.

Main Results:

  • Routine outcome data is subject to numerous biases and practical difficulties.
  • Comparisons of outcomes provide weak evidence of healthcare effectiveness or quality.
  • Outcomes data can be misleading if limitations are not understood.

Conclusions:

  • Enthusiasm for outcomes monitoring should be tempered by a clear understanding of its limitations.
  • Accurate interpretation of outcomes data is essential for reliable healthcare assessment.
  • Further research is needed to address the inherent challenges in outcomes measurement.

Related Experiment Videos