Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical and institutional review board issues

B E Skolnick1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia 19107, USA.

Advances in Neurology
|December 31, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) protect human research subjects by balancing the pursuit of scientific knowledge with ethical considerations. They ensure the welfare and rights of participants are paramount in all research endeavors.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative CT densitometry for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage growth.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2013
Same author

Cerebral hemodynamics, autoregulation, and blood pressure management.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2007
Same author

Radiologic estimation of hematoma volume in intracerebral hemorrhage trial by CT scan.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2006
Same author

Guidelines for acute stroke treatment centers.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America·1999
Same author

Relationship of 133Xe cerebral blood flow to middle cerebral arterial flow velocity in men at rest.

Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism·1996
Same author

Neurological deficits during duplex carotid imaging.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·1996

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Research Oversight

Background:

  • Physicians face a conflict of interest between patient welfare and generalizable research.
  • The pursuit of scientific knowledge can potentially conflict with individual patient well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical role of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in safeguarding human research subjects.
  • To emphasize the function of IRBs in mitigating conflicts of interest in research.

Main Methods:

  • IRBs operate under the Belmont Report principles and 45 CFR 46 regulations.
  • IRBs provide oversight to ensure ethical conduct and subject protection.

Main Results:

  • IRB approval validates the scientific and ethical integrity of research.
  • Conscientious IRBs assure the public that subject rights and welfare are prioritized.

Conclusions:

  • IRBs are essential for protecting human research subjects.
  • IRBs balance societal interest in scientific advancement with the protection of participant rights and welfare.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos