TRH mimetics: differentiation of antiamnesic potency from antidepressant effect

For the purpose of rational modification of the TRH molecule, we were pursuing an approach that consists of two steps: (1) 'obligatory' replacement of histidine with glutamine in TRH and (2) the application of conformational constraints for putative bioactive conformation I stabilized by an intramolecular hydrogen bond between C-terminal carboxamide proton and alpha-carbonyl of histidyl (glutaminyl), and conformation II formed by an intramolecular hydrogen bond between alpha-carbonyl of pyroglutamyl and prolinamide proton. Significant antiamnesic potency was discovered in the passive avoidance test (ECS and Scopolamine induced amnesia) for conformation II mimic (8S,10aS)-8-carbamoyl-1,2,3,6,7,8,9,10a- octahydro-5H,10H-pyrrolo[1,2-a][1,4]diazocin-5,10-dione (2) at doses of 0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg. EEG analysis indicates a mild activating effect of compound 2 on EEG, which is similar to that of piracetam and differs from hard amphetamine activation. Conformation I mimic 3-(2-carbamoylethyl)-2,3,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-1H,4H-pyrrolo[1,2-a] pyrazin-1,4-dione (1) exhibited an antidepressant effect at a dose of 1 mg/kg. The transition from two putative quasi-cyclic bioactive conformations of TRH and its obligatory similar analogue [Gln2]-TRH to their cyclic mimics led to differentiation of antiamnesic and antidepressant activity of TRH.