Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Calculating magnification differences in monocular aphakia

A Cohen

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |June 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    tDNA(ser) sequences are involved in the excision of Streptomyces griseus plasmid pSG1.

    Gene·1992
    Same author

    Expression of cytokines and their receptors by human thymocytes and thymic stromal cells.

    Immunology·1992
    Same author

    Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for intraductal carcinoma of the breast.

    The Journal of the Florida Medical Association·1992
    Same author

    Asymmetry in visual search for targets defined by differences in movement speed.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1992
    Same author

    Clinical decision making for discharge planning in a changing psychiatric environment.

    Health & social work·1992
    Same author

    Immunization of colorectal cancer patients with modified ovine submaxillary gland mucin and adjuvants induces IgM and IgG antibodies to sialylated Tn.

    Cancer research·1992
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    This study simplifies magnification difference calculations for better understanding. It presents key equations and illustrates them using monocular aphakia, aiding optical professionals.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Optics
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Magnification difference calculations are crucial in optics.
    • Existing formulas are often complex and inconsistently presented.
    • This complexity leads to varied interpretations and published methods.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To simplify and clarify the calculation of magnification differences.
    • To present pertinent equations in a more accessible format.
    • To illustrate the simplified formulas with a practical example.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and analysis of existing magnification difference formulas.
    • Derivation of simplified equations.
    • Application of simplified formulas to the specific case of monocular aphakia.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • A streamlined set of equations for calculating magnification differences.
    • Demonstration of the practical utility of these simplified equations.
    • Clear illustration of the concepts using monocular aphakia.

    Conclusions:

    • Simplified formulas enhance the understanding and application of magnification difference calculations.
    • The presented method offers a more convenient approach for optical professionals.
    • This work aids in reducing complexity and ambiguity in optical calculations.