Related Experiment Videos
An instrument for differentiating programs in prevention--primary, secondary and tertiary
The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
|July 1, 1976
Summary
Developing effective mental health prevention programs requires understanding primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. This study introduces an instrument to help differentiate these programs and clarify their design complexities.
Area of Science:
- Mental Health Research
- Public Health Interventions
- Program Development
Background:
- Mental health prevention program development has been slow.
- Inadequate understanding of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention models contributes to this delay.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe an instrument designed to differentiate mental health prevention programs.
- To clarify complexities in the design of prevention programs.
Main Methods:
- Instrument development for program differentiation.
- Analysis of critical dimensions in prevention program design.
Main Results:
- The developed instrument identifies key dimensions for distinguishing prevention programs.
- Clarification of underlying issues in designing effective prevention strategies.
Conclusions:
- The instrument aids in understanding and designing more effective mental health prevention programs.
- Improved differentiation of prevention types can accelerate program development.