Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A perspective on the dysplastic nevus controversy

M W Piepkorn1

  • 1Department of Medicine (Dermatology), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.

Pathology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

The term "dysplastic nevus" causes confusion and is no longer useful, according to a 1992 scientific panel. This review examines the history of this controversy and the panel's conclusions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dysplastic naevi with moderate to severe histological dysplasia: a risk factor for melanoma.

The British journal of dermatology·2006
Same author

Tumor vascularity, proliferation, and apoptosis in human melanoma micrometastases and macrometastases.

Archives of dermatology·1998
Same author

Skin biopsy indications in primary care practice: a population-based study.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice·1996
Same author

Survival and histopathologic characteristics of human melanocytic nevi transplanted to athymic (nude) mice.

The American Journal of dermatopathology·1995
Same author

Genetic basis of susceptibility to melanoma.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·1994
Same author

Reliability of skin biopsy pathology.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice·1994

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Pathology
  • Medical Terminology

Background:

  • The term "dysplastic nevus" has been widely used in dermatological and pathological contexts.
  • Significant debate exists regarding the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of this classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical evolution of the "dysplastic nevus" controversy.
  • To provide a foundation for understanding a 1992 scientific panel's recommendations regarding this term.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of historical scientific discourse.
  • Analysis of expert panel findings and recommendations.

Main Results:

  • A 1992 scientific panel concluded that "dysplastic nevus" has generated substantial confusion.
  • The panel determined the term has become obsolete and lacks clinical usefulness.

Conclusions:

  • The continued use of "dysplastic nevus" is problematic due to its ambiguity.
  • Re-evaluation of terminology in dermatopathology is warranted to improve diagnostic clarity.

Related Experiment Videos