Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Airway management and ventilation during CPR

C W Otto1

  • 1University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson 85724, USA.

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cardiac arrest and monitoring.

Anesthesiology clinics of North America·2002
Same author

Use of pressors in the treatment of cardiac arrest.

Annals of emergency medicine·2001
Same author

Catecholamines in cardiac arrest: role of alpha agonists, beta-adrenergic blockers and high-dose epinephrine.

Resuscitation·2000
Same author

Postresuscitation left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Treatment with dobutamine.

Circulation·1997
Same author

Assisted ventilation does not improve outcome in a porcine model of single-rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Circulation·1997
Same author

Active compression-decompression versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model: no improvement in outcome.

American heart journal·1996
Same journal

Abstracts from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiologists, 30th Congress, 10-13 June 2009, Odense, Denmark.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum·2009
Same journal

Abstracts from the 29th Congress of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 5-8 September 2007, Goteborg, Sweden.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum·2007
Same journal

Abstracts from the 28th Congress of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum·2005
Same journal

Abstracts from the 27th Congress of The Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. August 16-20, 2003, Helsinki, Finland.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum·2003
Same journal

Abstracts from the 26th Congress of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. June 13-17, 2001. Tromso, Norway.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum·2001
Same journal

The Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiologists 25th Congress. Aarhus, Denmark, June 9-11, 1999. Abstracts.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum·1999
See all related articles

Ventilation during basic life support does not improve survival in porcine cardiac arrest when advanced care is prompt. Chest compressions alone may be a more acceptable and equally effective bystander CPR method.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Resuscitation Science

Background:

  • Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for survival during cardiac arrest.
  • Reluctance to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation is a barrier to bystander CPR.
  • The effectiveness of chest compressions alone versus combined with ventilation requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of ventilation during basic life support on survival and neurological outcomes in a porcine model of fibrillatory cardiac arrest.
  • To compare the efficacy of chest compressions alone versus chest compressions with ventilation when advanced life support is provided promptly.

Main Methods:

  • A porcine model of fibrillatory cardiac arrest was utilized.
  • Animals received either chest compressions alone or chest compressions with ventilation during basic life support.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Advanced life support was administered within 15 minutes of cardiac arrest.

    • Main Results:

    • Ventilation during basic life support did not significantly improve 24-hour survival rates compared to chest compressions alone.
    • Neurological outcomes were not improved by the addition of ventilation during basic life support.
    • These findings were observed when advanced life support was initiated within 15 minutes.

    Conclusions:

    • In this porcine model, ventilation during basic life support does not enhance outcomes when advanced care is timely.
    • Chest compressions alone may be a viable and more acceptable alternative for bystander CPR, potentially increasing overall survival rates.