Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size

P D Sasieni1

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, U.K.

Biometrics
|January 10, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to Hersch et al.

Journal of medical screening·2015
Same author

Evaluating cytology for the detection of invasive cervical cancer.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2015
Same author

Informed decision-making and breast cancer screening.

Journal of medical screening·2015
Same author

Trends in the lifetime risk of developing cancer in Great Britain: comparison of risk for those born from 1930 to 1960.

British journal of cancer·2015
Same author

Reply to 'comment on cancer incidence in the United Kingdom: projections to the year 2030'.

British journal of cancer·2013
Same author

What is the lifetime risk of developing cancer?: the effect of adjusting for multiple primaries.

British journal of cancer·2011
Same journal

Interim analysis in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials for survival outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study compares three methods for analyzing genetic case-control data. Analyzing by genotype is recommended over allele-based methods for accurate disease risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Genetic case-control studies are crucial for understanding disease associations.
  • Existing methods for analyzing genetic data include allele frequency, genotype-based risk, and combined genotype approaches.
  • A systematic comparison of these methods is lacking in the literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare three distinct approaches for analyzing genetic case-control data.
  • To explore the interpretation of odds ratios across different analytical methods.
  • To evaluate the validity and applicability of allele-based versus genotype-based analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three analytical strategies: allele frequency, stratified genotype risk, and combined genotype risk.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of odds ratio interpretations and asymptotic equivalence between methods.
  • Discussion of chi-squared statistics and their appropriateness under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

    • Main Results:

    • The study systematically compares three common methods for genetic case-control data analysis.
    • Odds ratio interpretations vary, and asymptotic equivalence is shown between allele frequency and stratified genotype risk approaches under certain conditions.
    • Allele-based analyses are appropriate only when Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium holds and are asymptotically equivalent to genotype trend tests in such cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Genotype-based analysis is recommended over allele-based methods for analyzing genetic case-control data.
    • Allele-based analyses, while sometimes simpler, have limitations and should be used cautiously, particularly when Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is not assumed.
    • The findings advocate for genotype-level analysis for robust disease risk assessment in genetic studies.