Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Externally cued and internally generated selection: differences in distractor analysis and inhibition

G C Baylis1, S P Tipper, G Houghton

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|January 13, 1998
PubMed
Summary

In external selection, distractor inhibition improves efficiency but impairs later recognition. Internal selection, common in real-world scenarios, bypasses inhibition, leading to better distractor analysis and recognition.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying fear of childbirth in a UK population: qualitative examination of the clarity and acceptability of existing measurement tools in a small UK sample.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2020
Same author

Establishing a valid construct of fear of childbirth: findings from in-depth interviews with women and midwives.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2019
Same author

What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2018
Same author

Brief Report Reduced Negative Priming in Schizotypal Subjects does reflect Reduced Cognitive Inhibition.

Cognitive neuropsychiatry·2014
Same author

The effect of personal grooming on self-perceived body image.

International journal of cosmetic science·2014
Same author

Visual extinction and stimulus repetition.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Selective attention research typically uses externally guided tasks.
  • External selection involves experimenter-defined targets and actions.
  • Real-world selection often requires internally driven target identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of distractor inhibition in external versus internal selection.
  • To compare the effects of external and internal selection on distractor processing and later recognition.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of selection conditions (external vs. internal).
  • Measurement of distractor processing efficiency.
  • Assessment of later recognition memory for distractor items.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • External selection utilizes distractor inhibition, leading to efficient but shallow processing.
  • Internal selection lacks distractor inhibition, resulting in deeper processing and better recognition.
  • Distractor analysis is limited in external selection but enhanced in internal selection.

Conclusions:

  • Distractor inhibition is a key mechanism for efficient external selection.
  • Internal selection, prevalent in real-world situations, prioritizes thorough distractor analysis over inhibition.
  • Understanding these distinct selection mechanisms is crucial for explaining attention and memory in different contexts.