Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer review and PSRO: an update

F W Sullivan

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |January 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary

    This 1974-1975 review highlights challenges in medical peer review and Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs). Key issues include local review effectiveness and psychiatric involvement to prevent non-psychiatrists designing review procedures.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A state catastrophic health insurance plan and the peer review process.

    Hospital & community psychiatry·1977
    Same author

    Peer review and professional ethics.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1977
    Same author

    Peer review and PSRO in American psychiatry.

    The Psychiatric quarterly·1977
    Same author

    Senator Bennett: where are you? Any success of P.S.R.O. will be credited to him, any failure to organized medicine.

    R.I. medical journal·1975
    Same author

    Professional standards review organizations: the current scene.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1974
    Same author

    Relationship of clinical symptomatology to abnormal EEG findings: a family study.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1967

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare policy
    • Medical quality assurance

    Background:

    • Developments in peer review and Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSROs) were tracked between June 1974 and June 1975.
    • The medical profession's reaction to interim guidelines from the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare was examined.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To summarize advancements in peer review and PSROs.
    • To analyze the financial challenges associated with PSROs.
    • To emphasize the importance of psychiatric involvement in shaping review procedures.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and analysis of developments within professional organizations and government bodies.
    • Examination of professional and governmental reactions to new healthcare regulations.

    Main Results:

    • The study identified key issues in peer review and PSROs, focusing on the local review components.
    • Financial difficulties were noted as a significant problem for PSROs.
    • The medical profession's response to federal guidelines was a critical factor.

    Conclusions:

    • The effectiveness and availability of local review components are crucial for successful peer review and PSROs.
    • Lack of psychiatric engagement risks non-psychiatrists dictating review processes.
    • Active participation is essential for psychiatry to influence healthcare review standards.

    Related Experiment Videos