Related Experiment Videos

The use of personal health information in the coroner's inquiry

D S James1, S Leadbeatter

  • 1Wales Institute of Forensic Medicine, Cardif.

Insights

Pathologists should not determine the cause of death at coroner inquests. Medical records are not automatically available, and oral evidence from note-makers is preferred for disputed circumstances.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Pathology
  • Medical Law

Background:

  • Pathologists appointed by coroners often review medical notes and provide a cause of death.
  • This practice may not align with the legal framework of coroner's inquests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the pathologist's role in coroner's inquests.
  • To define the appropriate presentation of medical information during inquests.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the legal position regarding coroner's inquests.
  • Examination of the pathologist's responsibilities in interpreting medical evidence.

Main Results:

  • Coroners do not have automatic access to medical notes.
  • Oral evidence from medical professionals is the appropriate method for presenting clinical information, especially in disputed cases.
  • Pathologists should refrain from stating the cause of death when interpretation of clinical history or circumstantial evidence is required.

Conclusions:

  • The court, after hearing all evidence, should determine the cause of death.
  • Pathologists' role is to present findings, not to make the final determination of cause of death in disputed inquests.

Related Concept Videos