Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hysterectomy: improving the patient's decision-making process

J C Gambone1, R C Reiter

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCLA School of Medicine 90095, USA.

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
|January 16, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Isotopic enrichments via altered first and second solution electron affinities.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2011
Same author

Diminished solution electron affinities of carbon-13 and deuterium-substituted anion radical precursors allow isotopic enrichment.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2011
Same author

Lifestyle and metabolic approaches to maximizing erectile and vascular health.

International journal of impotence research·2011
Same author

Zwitterion radicals and anion radicals from electron transfer and solvent condensation with the fingerprint developing agent ninhydrin.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2001
Same author

University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics: outcomes management.

Nursing administration quarterly·2000
Same author

Practice implications.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·1999
Same journal

Obstetric Care for Patients With Cognitive Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Dissecting the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Requirements when Approaching Obstetric Patients With Disabilities: How to Ensure Your Spaces are Accessible for All.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Clinician Comfort and Barriers to the Obstetric and Gynecologic Care of Patients With Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Obstetric Care for Patients With Visual Impairments: Preconception Counseling Through Postpartum Care.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Menstrual Management and Contraception for Patients With Disabilities.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Favoring Elective Hospitalization in Pregnancies With Vasa Previa.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Patient involvement in medical decisions is increasing, shifting from informed consent to collaborative choice. Empowering patients in decisions like hysterectomy improves outcomes and satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Decision-Making
  • Patient Autonomy
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • The traditional model of informed consent is evolving towards shared decision-making.
  • Hysterectomy is often elective, highlighting the importance of patient preference when clear medical recommendations are absent.
  • Managed care raises concerns about cost influencing treatment recommendations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the shift towards informed collaborative choice in medical and surgical decision-making.
  • To emphasize the importance of integrating patient autonomy and preferences in healthcare.
  • To propose a framework for "rationing by patient choice" in elective procedures like hysterectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of patient involvement in healthcare decisions.
Keywords:
Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the impact of patient collaboration on clinical and non-clinical outcomes.
  • Discussion of ethical considerations and practical implementation of shared decision-making models.

    • Main Results:

    • Informed collaborative choice can lead to improved patient satisfaction and potentially lower costs.
    • Increased patient participation may reduce legal liability for adverse outcomes.
    • Objective information provision by health plans is crucial for informed patient decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • Integrating patient expectations and preferences is essential for ethical and effective healthcare.
    • Shared decision-making, particularly for elective procedures, respects patient autonomy and can optimize value.
    • A model of "rationing by patient choice" offers a feasible approach to balancing patient preferences with healthcare resource considerations.