Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Empirical affected-sib-pair statistics: two simulation strategies

C Dina¹, J C Buzzi, F Demenais

¹CNRS EP10, Lille, France.

Genetic Epidemiology

|January 1, 1997

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Population structure of modern-day Italians reveals patterns of ancient and archaic ancestries in Southern Europe.

Science advances·2019

Same author

Associations of pigmentary and naevus phenotype with melanoma risk in two populations with comparable ancestry but contrasting levels of ambient sun exposure.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2019

Same author

The COL5A3 and MMP9 genes interact in eczema susceptibility.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2017

Same author

Network-assisted analysis of GWAS data identifies a functionally-relevant gene module for childhood-onset asthma.

Scientific reports·2017

Same author

Adult onset asthma and interaction between genes and active tobacco smoking: The GABRIEL consortium.

PloS one·2017

Same author

Rare variants analysis of cutaneous malignant melanoma genes in Parkinson's disease.

Neurobiology of aging·2016

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

The P2 simulation procedure, which uses affected sibling genotypes, outperforms the P1 method for analyzing family genetic data. P2 is especially effective with high marker heterozygosity or available unaffected sibling data.

Area of Science:

Genetics
Statistical Genetics
Bioinformatics

Background:

Accurate genetic analysis in families relies on robust simulation procedures.
Missing parental genotype data presents a challenge in family-based genetic studies.
Affected sib-pair tests are commonly used for linkage analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the performance of two simulation procedures (P1 and P2) for empirical distributions of affected sib-pair test-statistics.
To evaluate the impact of missing parental marker information on these procedures.
To identify the optimal simulation strategy under varying conditions.

Main Methods:

Simulation of family samples with missing parental marker information.
Implementation of two procedures: P1 (ignoring affected sibs' genotypes) and P2 (accounting for affected sibs' genotypes) to impute parental genotypes.

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of empirical distributions generated by P1 and P2 for three affected sib-pair test-statistics.

Main Results:

The P2 procedure demonstrates superior performance compared to the P1 procedure.
P2's advantage is particularly pronounced under high marker heterozygosity (H = 75%).
P2 also shows improved performance when unaffected sibling data is available with low marker heterozygosity (H = 50%).

Conclusions:

The P2 simulation procedure is recommended for analyzing family samples with missing parental data, especially in scenarios with high marker heterozygosity or available unaffected sibling data.
The findings are consistent across all three affected sib-pair tests evaluated.
Choosing the appropriate simulation procedure is crucial for accurate genetic association studies.