Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning correlations in categorization tasks using large, ill-defined categories

R D Thomas1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA. thomasrd@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 24, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stability and Cooling of the C_{7}^{2-} Dianion.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

A field ionizer for photodetachment studies of negative ions.

The Review of scientific instruments·2022
Same author

Time-Resolved Photoelectron Studies of Thiophene and 2,5-Dimethylthiophene.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2018
Same author

The ring-opening channel and the influence of Rydberg states on the excited state dynamics of furan and its derivatives.

The Journal of chemical physics·2018
Same author

Erratum: Rotationally Cold OH^{-} Ions in the Cryogenic Electrostatic Ion-Beam Storage Ring DESIREE [Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 073001 (2017)].

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Rotationally Cold OH^{-} Ions in the Cryogenic Electrostatic Ion-Beam Storage Ring DESIREE.

Physical review letters·2017
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated how people learn category correlations. Some participants accurately used correlation information, while others showed category-specific learning, indicating explicit memory representations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Machine Learning Theory
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding how humans learn complex categories is crucial for artificial intelligence and cognitive modeling.
  • Category learning research often focuses on decision boundaries, but less is known about sensitivity to correlational information within categories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if participants can learn and utilize within-category correlations between stimulus dimensions.
  • To investigate how category overlap and training conditions influence the representation of correlational information.
  • To explore whether participants form explicit memory representations of decision boundaries.

Main Methods:

  • Participants underwent categorization training with large, overlapping categories where dimensional correlations varied.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A subsequent attribute-prediction task assessed sensitivity to these correlations.
  • Two distinct training conditions manipulated the sign of the correlation, while maintaining identical optimal categorization rules.

    • Main Results:

    • A subset of participants accurately predicted stimulus attributes based on learned correlations.
    • Another group demonstrated correlation-based predictions only within their learned category regions, suggesting explicit boundary representation.
    • Some participants showed no accessible correlational information during the prediction task.

    Conclusions:

    • Category learning can involve the explicit representation of decision boundaries, influencing how correlational information is utilized.
    • Individual differences exist in the ability to extract and apply correlational information during category learning.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the flexibility and limitations of human category learning mechanisms.