Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alignment and category learning

M E Lassaline1, G L Murphy

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA. gmurphy@s.psych.uniuc.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 24, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole genome sequencing identified a 16 kilobase deletion on ECA13 associated with distichiasis in Friesian horses.

BMC genomics·2020
Same author

A missense mutation in damage-specific DNA binding protein 2 is a genetic risk factor for ocular squamous cell carcinoma in Belgian horses.

Equine veterinary journal·2019
Same author

Induction and category coherence.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Combined keratectomy, strontium-90 irradiation and permanent bulbar conjunctival grafts for corneolimbal squamous cell carcinomas in horses (1990-2002): 38 horses.

Veterinary ophthalmology·2007
Same author

Lung lesions in SCID-bo and SCID-bg mice after intratracheal inoculation with wild-type or leucotoxin-deficient mutant strains of Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1.

Journal of comparative pathology·2006
Same author

Profiles of matrix metalloproteinase activity in equine tear fluid during corneal healing in 10 horses with ulcerative keratitis.

Veterinary ophthalmology·2004
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Category learning is enhanced by aligning features on the same dimension. Mismatched feature alignments hinder learning more when on the same dimension, impacting category formation models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Similarity comparisons are understood to involve feature alignment.
  • The role of feature alignment in category learning remains less explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether feature alignment plays a role in category learning.
  • To determine how aligned versus nonaligned feature matches influence category acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Six studies were conducted to examine the effects of aligned and nonaligned feature matches on category learning.
  • Participants learned categories with features that either matched or mismatched across dimensions.

Main Results:

  • Aligned feature matches within a category significantly facilitated learning compared to nonaligned matches.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Nonaligned matches still improved learning relative to nonmatches.
  • Feature matches that crossed category boundaries impaired learning, with greater impairment occurring for matches on the same dimension.

    • Conclusions:

    • Feature alignment is a critical component of category learning.
    • Current category learning models require modifications to incorporate the distinction between aligned and nonaligned feature matches.
    • Understanding feature alignment provides insights into human categorization processes.