Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough

J Lau1, J P Ioannidis, C H Schmid

  • 1Division of Clinical Care Research, New England Medical Center Hospitals, Boston, MA 02111, USA. joseph.lau@es.nemc.org

Lancet (London, England)
|January 24, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiscale Analysis of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Anatomo-Electrophysio-Pathologic Differentiation - CORRIGENDUM.

The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques·2025
Same author

Atypical metatarsal fracture in a Chinese postmenopausal woman with osteoporosis on long-term denosumab: a case report.

Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi·2024
Same author

Regional economic burden of revision total knee replacement: A cost-complexity analysis.

The Knee·2022
Same author

Hashimoto's thyroiditis on outcomes in papillary thyroid cancer revisited: experience from South East Asia.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2022
Same author

Baseline staging imaging for distant metastasis in women with stages I, II, and III breast cancer.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2020
Same author

Framing of the opioid problem in cancer pain management in Canada.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2019

Meta-analyses offer valuable insights despite potential biases from unreported negative trials and heterogeneity. While acknowledging limitations, their strengths in synthesizing research evidence are considered superior.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Meta-analyses are increasingly used to synthesize clinical trial data.
  • Concerns exist regarding biases, heterogeneity, and discrepancies with large randomized trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of meta-analyses in clinical research.
  • To provide a balanced perspective on the utility of combined analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of common criticisms and limitations of meta-analyses.
  • Consideration of issues such as publication bias, heterogeneity, and trial generalizability.

Main Results:

  • Acknowledges that unreported negative trials and significant heterogeneity can pose challenges.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Highlights that meta-analyses, like individual trials, report population effects, not individual patient guidance.
  • Notes potential disagreements between large randomized trials and prior meta-analyses.

    • Conclusions:

    • Despite valid criticisms, the strengths of meta-analyses in evidence synthesis are generally considered to outweigh their weaknesses.
    • A comprehensive approach is needed to address the limitations while leveraging the benefits of meta-analyses.