The influence of suction catheter tip design on tracheobronchial trauma and fluid aspiration efficiency

The suctioning efficiency and trauma-producing characteristics of five commercially available tracheobronchial suction catheters (Pharmaseal Tri-Flo, NCC Gentle-Flo, Argyle Aero-Flo, Argyle Dual Side-Hole, and Pharmaseal Whistle-Tip) were experimentally evaluated in anesthetized healthy dogs. The tendency of catheters to invaginate or "grab" tracheobronchial mucosa was observed with a bronchofiberscope during suctioning. Mucosal grabbing was seldom seen even at high (greater than 300 torr) vacuum levels with the cateter tip in the trachea. All catheters were observed to invaginate mucosa in lobar and segmental bronchi, with the frequency of grabbing being a function of airway anatomy, airway size, catheter orientation, tip design, and vacuum level. Catheters with multiple side-holes appeared to invaginate mucosa less frequently than the single side-hole catheter. Repeated suctioning of anesthetized healthy dogs followed by tracheobronchial excision, gross observation, and histologic examination of mucosal tissue biopsies demonstrated significant differences in the frequency and severity of lesions caused by the tracheobronchial suction procedure. All catheters were observed to damage airway lining, the damage related to multiple side-hole catheters appearing to be associated entirely with the act of cateter insertion and not with the application of vacuum. Only the Whistle-Tip design produced measurable damage beyond that related to catheter insertion. The average tip-suctioning effectiveness for each catheter, determined in vitro by aspirating a thin, uniform layer of simulated mucus, was found to be significantly higher for the Tri-Flo and Whistle-Tip catheters than the others, the Aero-Flo being least effective. Preliminary attempts to demonstrate this difference in suctioning effectiveness by comparing the performance of the catheters which displayed the highest and lowest tip suction effectiveness in a standardized clinical suctioning procedure revealed no significant difference in the percentage of mucus removed by either catheter. Additional studies should clarify this apparent contradiction.