Related Experiment Videos
Levonorgestrel contraceptive implants in female patients 14 to 21 years old
V J Suman1, J T Van Winter, M P Evans
1Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Objective:
To determine which factors are associated with duration of use of a levonorgestrel implant (Norplant) for contraception in adolescents and young adults.
Design:
We retrospectively studied 144 young women (14 to 21 years of age) who chose a levonorgestrel contraceptive implant at Mayo Clinic Rochester between April 1990 and December 1993.
Material And Methods:
The following information was obtained at the time of insertion of the implant and from any follow-up visits: demographics, prior contraceptive experiences, frequency and management of complications, complications noted at removal of the implant, and subsequent contraceptive choice. The duration of use was examined.
Results:
Of the 144 young women who underwent insertion of a Norplant system, 75 telephoned or made a medical appointment because of implant-related side effects. During the follow-up period, 64 patients had the Norplant system removed. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of the Norplant system remaining in place for at least 12 months was 83 % and for at least 24 months was 63 %. Duration of Norplant use was not found to differ with respect to age, prior contraceptive use, or timing of insertion, but it was significantly shorter among those with a prior pregnancy than in those who had never been pregnant.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that a group of young women who are likely to continue use of a contraceptive implant (with or without treatment for side effects) are those who have never been pregnant.