Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Causing death or allowing to die? Developments in the law

P R Ferguson1

  • 1Department of Law, University of Dundee, Scotland.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|February 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Doctors face legal challenges when ending patient lives. This analysis explores "mercy killing" cases, contrasting legal outcomes based on patient condition and consent, revealing apparent contradictions in medical law.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Information giving in clinical trials: the views of medical researchers.

Bioethics·2003
Same author

Patients' perceptions of information provided in clinical trials.

Journal of medical ethics·2002
Same author

Characterization of a thymidylate synthase (TS)-inducible cell line: a model system for studying sensitivity to TS- and non-TS-targeted chemotherapies.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2001
Same author

Patients' experiences and views of clinical trials.

Medicine and law·2001
Same author

Causing death or allowing to die? A rejoinder to Randall's comments.

Journal of medical ethics·1998
Same author

The civil liability of the pharmacist.

Medicine, science, and the law·1998

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Bioethics
  • Criminal Law

Background:

  • Legal and ethical dilemmas arise for physicians involved in end-of-life decisions.
  • Recent court cases highlight the complexities surrounding a doctor's role in hastening or prolonging a patient's death.

Observation:

  • The case of Dr. Cox, convicted of attempted murder, is examined alongside the Tony Bland and Janet Johnstone cases involving patients in a persistent vegetative state.
  • In all analyzed cases, physicians deemed the patients' quality of life extremely poor, justifying non-prolongation of life.

Findings:

  • Prosecution occurred in the case where a terminally ill patient explicitly requested hastened death.
  • The law appears to approach cases of ending life inconsistently, particularly concerning motive, diminished responsibility, and patient consent.
Keywords:
Airedale NHS Trust v. BlandAnalytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaLaw Hospital NHS Trust v. Lord AdvocateLegal ApproachR. v. Cox

Related Experiment Videos

Implications:

  • This review suggests a need for clearer legal frameworks regarding physician-assisted end-of-life decisions.
  • Understanding these legal contradictions is crucial for medical professionals navigating complex ethical and legal terrain.