Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Questionable ethics--whistle-blowing or tale-telling?

T Chambers1

  • 1Richard Bright Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|February 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The development and validation of a nationwide dataset of water distribution zones in Aotearoa New Zealand: A cross-sectional geospatial study.

Data in brief·2023
Same author

New Zealand's Public Services Act: a policy opportunity for cross-government action on unhealthy products.

Perspectives in public health·2020
Same author

Predicting the safety of medicines in pregnancy: A workshop report.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2020
Same author

Evaluation of the Implementation of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria in the HERBY Trial of Pediatric Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2019
Same author

Children's home and school neighbourhood exposure to alcohol marketing: Using wearable camera and GPS data to directly examine the link between retailer availability and visual exposure to marketing.

Health & place·2018
Same author

Genomic sequence investigation Streptococcus pyogenes clusters in England (2010-2015).

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2018
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Renal biopsy, a risky procedure, was performed without clear clinical need. This raises ethical questions about medical practice and journal publication standards for such cases.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Medical Ethics
  • Publishing Ethics

Background:

  • Renal biopsy is an invasive diagnostic procedure.
  • It is typically indicated for specific therapeutic or diagnostic reasons.
  • The ethical justification for performing such procedures is paramount.

Observation:

  • An open renal biopsy was conducted despite a lack of apparent accepted clinical indication.
  • The results were submitted for publication in a specialty medical journal.
  • Journal editors rejected subsequent correspondence discussing the procedure's ethical propriety.

Findings:

  • The case highlights a renal biopsy performed without clear medical necessity.
  • Journal editors questioned the ethical appropriateness of the procedure.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • The publication process revealed concerns regarding the ethical oversight of medical interventions.

    • Implications:

    • This case prompts a discussion on the ethical boundaries of performing medical procedures.
    • It underscores the responsibility of authors, editors, and institutions in upholding ethical standards.
    • The incident raises questions about the role of specialty journals in scrutinizing ethically ambiguous research.