Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Compulsory, ambulatory psychiatric treatment]

R Durst1, A Teitelbaum, Y Bar-el

  • 1Arie Jaros Jerusalem Mental Health Center, Jerusalem District.

Harefuah
|February 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Symptomatic improvement after mesh removal: a prospective longitudinal study of women with urogynaecological mesh complications.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2021
Same author

The characteristics of patients with possible familial hypercholesterolemia-screening a large payer/provider healthcare delivery system.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2019
Same author

Coronary stent restenosis and the association with allergy to metal content of 316L stainless steel.

Cardiovascular journal of Africa·2018
Same author

Automated circuit fabrication and direct characterization of carbon nanotube vibrations.

Nature communications·2016
Same author

The disorder named koro.

Behavioural neurology·2014
Same author

Formation risk of toxic and other unwanted compounds in pressure-assisted thermally processed foods.

Journal of food science·2012

The Order for Compulsory Ambulatory Treatment (OCAT) law aims to balance patient liberty with clinical needs. However, the study found OCAT was ineffective in 33.1% of cases, failing to prevent hospitalization.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Mental Health Law
  • Public Health Policy

Context:

  • The 1991 Law introduced the Order for Compulsory Ambulatory Treatment (OCAT) as an alternative to hospitalization for mentally ill individuals.
  • OCAT allows district psychiatrists to mandate outpatient treatment for up to six months, extendable, balancing civil liberties with clinical necessity.
  • The law aims to prevent over-confinement while ensuring adequate treatment, addressing risks of neglect or danger from under-treatment.

Purpose:

  • To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the Order for Compulsory Ambulatory Treatment (OCAT) in Jerusalem and southern districts over four years.
  • To assess OCAT's success in preventing compulsory hospitalization and facilitating community living for patients.
  • To provide data-driven recommendations for improving the enforcement and training related to OCAT.

Related Experiment Videos

Summary:

  • The study analyzed OCAT's effectiveness over four years, finding it fully effective in 44.4% of cases.
  • A significant 33.1% of OCAT cases were ineffective, failing to prevent compulsory hospitalization, a primary objective.
  • Partial effectiveness was observed in the remaining cases, indicating mixed outcomes in practice.

Impact:

  • The findings suggest a need for improved enforcement mechanisms and resource allocation for OCAT.
  • Recommendations include making forceful hospitalization and OCAT mandatory components of psychiatric residency programs.
  • The study highlights the challenges in balancing patient rights with the need for compulsory treatment in mental healthcare.