Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The 'double track' policy for donor anonymity

¹Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Vakgroep Filosofie, Belgium.

Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)

|February 10, 1998

Summary

A flexible donor anonymity policy allowing donors and recipients to choose is proposed. This "double track" approach respects individual preferences and balances the rights of all parties involved in donation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Identifying essential information for a valid informed consent of egg donors: an international Delphi study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2025

Same author

Redefining elective co-parenting as PACT: a systematic assessment of published concepts and definitions.

Journal of reproductive and infant psychology·2025

Same author

The representation of medical risks and incentives concerning egg donation: an analysis of the websites of fertility clinics of Belgium, Spain and the UK.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2024

Same author

Fertility preservation in boys: recent developments and new insights <sup>†</sup>.

Human reproduction open·2020

Same author

Recent developments in genetics and medically-assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications<sup>†‡</sup>.

Human reproduction open·2019

Same author

Reply: Ethics of anonymity in gamete donation and genetic databases.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2019

Area of Science:

Reproductive Medicine
Bioethics
Public Policy

Background:

Current donor anonymity policies are often imposed uniformly on all participants.
There is no definitive evidence supporting a single best policy for donor anonymity.
This lack of flexibility can create conflicts and fail to address diverse stakeholder needs.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose an alternative policy for donor anonymity that accommodates diverse preferences.
To explore a "double track" system where donors and recipients can choose anonymity or identification.
To assess how this policy balances the rights of donors, recipients, and donor offspring.

Main Methods:

Analysis of existing policies and ethical considerations regarding donor anonymity.
Development of a "double track" policy framework.
Evaluation of the proposed policy's capacity to balance stakeholder rights and respect individual choices.

Main Results:

The "double track" policy allows donors to choose anonymity or identification.
Recipients can also select whether they prefer an anonymous or identifiable donor.
This approach offers a more adaptable solution compared to uniform policies.

Conclusions:

The proposed "double track" donor anonymity policy is the most effective way to balance the rights of all parties.
This policy acknowledges the plurality of perspectives and the absence of a universal standard for donor anonymity.
Implementing this flexible approach respects individual autonomy and diverse ethical viewpoints in donation processes.

Related Experiment Videos