Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Meta-analysis of multitreatment studies

¹Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA. hasse002@mc.duke.edu

Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

|February 10, 1998

Summary

New meta-analytic methods enable comparisons of multiple competing therapies, moving beyond standard pairwise analyses. This advancement supports more comprehensive evidence synthesis in research and clinical practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

The New England journal of medicine·2011

Same author

Racial differences in blood pressure response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in children: a meta-analysis.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2008

Same author

Association of intradialytic blood pressure changes with hospitalization and mortality rates in prevalent ESRD patients.

Kidney international·2007

Same author

Initial experience with factor-Xa inhibition in percutaneous coronary intervention: the XaNADU-PCI Pilot.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2004

Same author

Time-based risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Implications for timing of discharge and applications to medical decision-making.

European heart journal·2003

Same author

Evaluation of cervical cytology.

Evidence report/technology assessment (Summary)·2002

Area of Science:

Medical research
Biostatistics
Evidence-based medicine

Background:

Many studies compare multiple competing therapies, but existing meta-analytic methods are limited to pairwise comparisons.
This limitation restricts the comprehensive synthesis of evidence when more than two treatments are evaluated.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce generalized meta-analytic methods capable of comparing any number of competing therapies.
To extend current meta-analytic techniques to accommodate multi-treatment comparisons.

Main Methods:

Development of generalized meta-analytic models.
Inclusion of both fixed-effects and random-effects models for multi-treatment comparisons.
Statistical framework for synthesizing evidence from studies with multiple interventions.

Main Results:

The proposed methods allow for direct comparison of more than two therapies within a meta-analysis.
The generalized models provide a flexible framework for analyzing complex comparative studies.
Both fixed- and random-effects approaches are incorporated for robust analysis.

Conclusions:

The generalized meta-analytic methods overcome the limitations of pairwise comparisons.
These methods facilitate more complete and accurate evidence synthesis for multiple competing therapies.
This approach enhances the utility of meta-analysis in fields with complex treatment comparisons.

Related Experiment Videos