Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

A Procedure to Study the Effect of Prolonged Food Restriction on Heroin Seeking in Abstinent Rats
Published on: November 11, 2013
The case for a heroin substitution treatment trial in Canada
Abstract:
Illicit opiate use in Canada causes considerable harm and social cost. Methadone substitution treatment, which has been proven effective in reducing the negative effects associated with opiate use, has been used in Canada, but so far only on a small scale. Recent research suggests that, while expanding the availability of methadone substitution is certainly in the public health interest, it would not be sufficient in itself to reduce to a minimum the harms from illicit opiate use. On the basis of the epidemiology of opiate use and of related harms, and building on the experience of intervention efforts currently underway elsewhere, this paper argues for the establishment of a heroin substitution trial in Canada. Such a trial should have the goal of investigating the potential of heroin substitution to significantly reduce the health and social costs to Canadians from illicit opiate use.
Insights
Heroin substitution trials in Canada are proposed to reduce harms from illicit opiate use. While methadone treatment helps, it is insufficient alone. Heroin substitution could significantly lower health and social costs.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Addiction Medicine
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Illicit opiate use in Canada results in significant harm and social costs.
- Methadone substitution treatment is effective but underutilized in Canada.
- Current methadone availability alone may not sufficiently mitigate harms from illicit opiate use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To advocate for the establishment of a heroin substitution trial in Canada.
- To investigate the potential of heroin substitution to reduce opiate-related harms.
- To build upon existing research and intervention strategies for opiate use disorder.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the epidemiology of opiate use and related harms in Canada.
- Review of international experiences with heroin substitution interventions.
- Argumentation for a controlled heroin substitution trial based on evidence.
Main Results:
- Methadone substitution, while beneficial, is insufficient to minimize all harms associated with illicit opiate use.
- Expanding methadone access is in the public health interest but requires complementary strategies.
- Heroin substitution trials offer a potential avenue for further harm reduction.
Conclusions:
- A heroin substitution trial in Canada is warranted to explore its efficacy in reducing health and social costs.
- Evidence suggests heroin substitution may offer significant benefits beyond current treatment models.
- Further research through controlled trials is necessary to confirm the impact of heroin substitution.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Dependence
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies

