Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do juries listen to jury instructions?

S H Berger1

  • 1Logansport State Hospital, IN 46947, USA.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural analysis of cDNA encoding thymidylate synthase in hepatic metastases of human colorectal tumors.

International journal of colorectal disease·2001
Same author

Human thymidylate synthase is in the closed conformation when complexed with dUMP and raltitrexed, an antifolate drug.

Biochemistry·2001
Same author

Structure of human thymidylate synthase suggests advantages of chemotherapy with noncompetitive inhibitors.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2001
Same author

Isolation and characterization of a thymidylate synthase-deficient human colon tumor cell line.

Biochemical pharmacology·1999
Same author

Genetic complementation and resistance to 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine in thymidine auxotrophs expressing a highly defective mutant of human thymidylate synthase.

Biochemical pharmacology·1999
Same author

Substitution at residue 214 of human thymidylate synthase alters nucleotide binding and isomerization of ligand-protein complexes.

Biochemistry·1999

Juries may disregard evidence and expert testimony in medical malpractice cases, prioritizing a physician's bedside manner. This suggests a shift in juror expectations for psychiatric care.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Psychiatry
  • Jury Studies

Background:

  • Medical malpractice litigation presents complex legal and ethical challenges.
  • Jury decision-making processes in high-stakes cases are not fully understood.
  • The role of expert testimony and evidence is crucial in legal proceedings.

Observation:

  • A physician was sued for medical malpractice, resulting in a nonunanimous jury verdict for the plaintiff.
  • Post-trial juror interviews revealed a disregard for presented evidence and expert testimonies.
  • Jurors focused on the physician's perceived "bedside manner" rather than objective case facts.

Findings:

  • The jury's decision was significantly influenced by their perception of the physician's interpersonal conduct.
  • Expert testimony and legal instructions were de-emphasized in the jury's deliberation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A disconnect exists between the legal standards of psychiatric practice and juror expectations.

    • Implications:

    • Physicians, particularly psychiatrists, may need to cultivate strong interpersonal skills alongside clinical expertise.
    • Legal strategies in malpractice cases might need to account for the "bedside manner" factor.
    • Future research should explore juror biases and the impact of physician-patient relationships on legal outcomes.