Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Kansas v. Hendricks

A J Grudzinskas1, M G Henry

  • 1University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Worcester, USA.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

The Supreme Court upheld Kansas's Sexually Violent Predator Act, affirming that its definition of "mental abnormality" meets due process standards. This ruling allows for civil commitment proceedings without violating constitutional protections.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emergency surgical measures aboard an APA during an amphibious invasion.

United States naval medical bulletin·2010
Same author

Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.

Wisconsin law review·2005
Same author

Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1999
Same author

General Electric Co. v. Joiner: lighting up the post-Daubert landscape?

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1998
Same author

The efficacy of involuntary outpatient treatment in Massachusetts.

Administration and policy in mental health·1998
Same author

A national survey of "consumer empowerment" at the state level.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·1998

Area of Science:

  • Law and Society
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Constitutional Law

Background:

  • The Kansas Sexually Violent Predator Act allows for civil commitment of individuals with mental abnormalities or personality disorders posing a risk of predatory sexual violence.
  • The Kansas Supreme Court had previously invalidated this Act, leading to a U.S. Supreme Court appeal.

Observation:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of the Kansas Sexually Violent Predator Act.
  • Key legal challenges included substantive due process, double jeopardy, and ex post facto law concerns.

Findings:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the Act's definition of "mental abnormality" satisfies substantive due process requirements.
  • The Court determined that the Act's civil commitment proceedings do not violate double jeopardy or ex post facto prohibitions.

Implications:

  • This decision provides a legal framework for managing sexually violent predators through civil commitment.
  • The ruling clarifies constitutional boundaries for state laws addressing public safety and mental health.
  • It may influence similar legislation and legal challenges in other jurisdictions.

Related Experiment Videos