Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Correlation between binding and dynamics at SH2 domain interfaces

L E Kay1, D R Muhandiram, G Wolf

  • 1Protein Engineering Network Centres of Excellence and Department of Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Nature Structural Biology
|February 14, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Specific (15)N, NH correlations for residues in(15) N, (13)C and fractionally deuterated proteins that immediately follow methyl-containing amino acids.

Journal of biomolecular NMR·2010
Same author

A combined HNCA/HNCO experiment for 15N labeled proteins with 13C at natural abundance.

Journal of biomolecular NMR·2003
Same author

Deuterium spin probes of side-chain dynamics in proteins. 1. Measurement of five relaxation rates per deuteron in (13)C-labeled and fractionally (2)H-enriched proteins in solution.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2002
Same author

Distribution of molecular size within an unfolded state ensemble using small-angle X-ray scattering and pulse field gradient NMR techniques.

Journal of molecular biology·2002
Same author

Structural characterization of proteins with an attached ATCUN motif by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement NMR spectroscopy.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2001
Same author

Flexibility and ligand exchange in a buried cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme studied by multinuclear NMR.

Biochemistry·2000
Same journal

Fingering nucleic acids: the RNA did it.

Nature structural biology·2003
Same journal

Histone H1.2 as a trigger for apoptosis.

Nature structural biology·2003
Same journal

Tom40: more than just a channel.

Nature structural biology·2003
Same journal

Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank.

Nature structural biology·2003
Same journal

Small RNAs come of age.

Nature structural biology·2003
Same journal

Recognition and processing of the origin of transfer DNA by conjugative relaxase TrwC.

Nature structural biology·2003
See all related articles

Protein dynamics, not just static structures, are crucial for biological recognition. NMR studies reveal that restricted motion at protein interfaces correlates with binding energy, improving our understanding of protein interactions.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Molecular Dynamics

Background:

  • Protein-protein interactions are fundamental to biological processes.
  • Static structural data of protein complexes offers insights but has limitations in predicting binding affinities.
  • Previous studies modifying protein interfaces showed static structures alone are insufficient to explain binding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of protein dynamics in specific protein recognition.
  • To determine if dynamics at the interface correlate with binding energy.
  • To assess the predictive power of structural data versus dynamic data for binding affinities.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) relaxation experiments to probe methyl group dynamics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Studied complexes of phospholipase Cgamma1 and Syp phosphatase SH2 domains with phosphopeptides.
  • Analyzed structural data and performed binding affinity studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Structural data alone was not predictive of binding affinities for the studied complexes.
    • NMR relaxation experiments indicated a correlation between binding energy and the restriction of motion.
    • Dynamics of methyl groups at the interfacial region are linked to specific binding.

    Conclusions:

    • Protein dynamics, specifically restricted motion at the interface, are critical for specific protein recognition and binding affinity.
    • Dynamic information provides a more accurate understanding of protein interactions than static structures alone.
    • This study highlights the importance of considering molecular dynamics in the field of structural biology and drug discovery.