Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Junk DNA and sectorial gene repression

E Zuckerkandl1

  • 1Institute of Molecular Medical Sciences, Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.

Gene
|February 14, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Eukaryotic transcriptional repression uses large DNA sectors, unlike bacterial models. This "superrepression" reclassifies genomic "junk" DNA, including introns, as functional, potentially explaining cell type stability and development.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intrinsically driven changes in gene interaction complexity. I. Growth of regulatory complexes and increase in number of genes.

Journal of molecular evolution·2001
Same author

Social constructionism, a lost cause.

Journal of molecular evolution·2000
Same author

Cytosine deamination plays a primary role in the evolution of mammalian isochores.

Molecular biology and evolution·2000
Same author

Sectorial gene repression in the control of development.

Gene·1999
Same author

The journal and its field: a case of co-evolution.

Journal of molecular evolution·1998
Same author

Neutral and nonneutral mutations: the creative mix--evolution of complexity in gene interaction systems.

Journal of molecular evolution·1997
Same journal

Genome‑wide identification of the PRN gene family in Rosaceae and the function of PbrPRN2/3 in regulating pollen tube growth.

Gene·2026
Same journal

TBX6 promotes proliferation, invasion, and migration in colorectal cancer: Integrated transcriptomic and protein interaction network analysis.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Face/off: phase-specific modeling of lineage plasticity using near-patient models in genitourinary cancers.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical analysis of metabolic phenotype reveals distinct microbiota and circulatory transcriptome in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Mutation T71R enhanced the structural stability and functional activity of wild type superoxide dismutase cloned from soil metagenome.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Reduced ATXN1 expression as an adverse prognostic indicator in Acute myeloid leukemia.

Gene·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Developmental Biology

Background:

  • Eukaryotic transcriptional repression involves extensive DNA regions (kilobases), contrasting with simpler bacterial models.
  • Classical repression models focus on repressor factors binding to promoters and enhancers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and define a novel mode of transcriptional repression termed "sectorial repression" or "superrepression" in eukaryotes.
  • To explore the functional implications of superrepression, particularly its role in utilizing non-coding DNA and its contribution to the c-value paradox.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and comparison of bacterial and eukaryotic transcriptional repression models.
  • Hypothesizing the role of large DNA sectors, introns, and GC-rich motifs in superrepression.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Superrepression utilizes significantly larger DNA segments, re-contextualizing "junk DNA" as functional.
  • Introns and heterochromatoid structures are implicated in stabilizing superrepressed chromatin, especially for developmental genes.
  • Competition for DNA-binding factors among superrepressible sectors provides a mechanism for developmental switches and cell type specification.

Conclusions:

  • Sectorial repression is crucial for establishing stable cell types and distinguishing between determination and cell type specification.
  • The evolution of heavy isochores and GC-rich motifs may have expanded the repertoire of stable cell types.
  • Non-coding sequences often function collectively, challenging the notion of sequence dispensability as non-functionality.