Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gestational assessment assessed

U Wariyar1, W Tin, E Hey

  • 1Neonatal Services, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne.

Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
|February 14, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The PREM score: a graphical tool for predicting survival in very preterm births.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2009
Same author

Optimum oxygen therapy in preterm babies.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2007
Same author

How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2006
Same author

Can all neonatal resuscitation be managed by nurse practitioners?

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2005
Same author

Health and school performance of teenagers born before 29 weeks gestation.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2003
Same author

Vitamin K--what, why, and when.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2003
Same journal

Postnatally acquired cytomegalovirus infection in preterm infants: an update on diagnosis, management and outcomes.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2026
Same journal

High versus low PEEP in the delivery room: a preimplementation and postimplementation cohort study.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2026
Same journal

Trends in the incidence of low-grade intraventricular haemorrhage among preterm babies: a national cohort study.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2026
Same journal

Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal high flow during neonatal intubation: a prospective audit.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2026
Same journal

Visual acuity assessments at 5 years in a national cohort (EPIPAGE-2).

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2026
Same journal

Clinicians' attitudes to the West Midlands damage control surgery pathway for severe necrotising enterocolitis.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2026
See all related articles

Postnatal gestational age assessment is unreliable, with significant errors in recording antenatal data. Antenatal ultrasound dating remains the most accurate method for determining pregnancy gestation.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Medical Record Accuracy

Background:

  • Accurate gestational age assessment is crucial for neonatal care and management.
  • Existing methods for determining gestational age post-birth have shown variability in reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of recorded obstetric information on gestation in neonatal records.
  • To assess the reliability of postnatal methods for determining gestational age.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewed antenatal and neonatal records for accuracy of gestation recording.
  • Conducted a prospective study assessing paediatric staff's reliability in estimating gestational age post-birth.
  • Evaluated different postnatal assessment techniques against antenatal ultrasound dating.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Postnatal assessments were half as accurate as early antenatal ultrasound dating (95% CI +/- 17 days).
  • Clinical assessments of neonates under 32 weeks gestation were less reliable than retrospective reflex assessments and tended to overestimate gestation.
  • Over 10% of postnatal records contained errors in the transcription or computation of antenatal gestation information.

Conclusions:

  • Antenatal ultrasound dating is superior to all postnatal methods for determining gestational age.
  • Significant inaccuracies in recording gestation at birth are present despite reliable antenatal data.