Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Induction of Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transitions in Sarcoma Cells
Published on: April 7, 2017
Cell transforming genes and tumor progression: in vivo unified secondary phenotypic cell changes
G J Deichman1, V A Matveeva, L M Kashkina
1Institute of Carcinogenesis, Cancer Research Center, Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia. antitum@iki.rssi.ru
Abstract:
We have earlier shown that Syrian hamster cells spontaneously transformed in vitro during in vivo progression, acquire in 1 step, along with highly increased tumorigenicity, 2 new properties characterizing the [H2O2CA + tPGE(S)] phenotype, i.e., a high H2O2 catabolizing (antioxidant) activity and the ability to release PGE2 upon contact with NK cells. In contrast, RSV-SR-(v-src)-transformed cells acquire the [H2O2CA + PGE(S)] phenotype and high tumorigenicity during in vitro transformation, i.e., without preliminary in vivo selection. In the present study, the possible influence of different transforming genes on the rates of subsequent in vivo tumor progression was studied using cells in vitro transformed by SV40, BAV-3, or transduced by activated genes Ha-ras, p53, myc and bcl-2. The expression of the [H2O2CA + PGE(S)] phenotype, the extent of tumorigenic and spontaneous metastasizing activities were examined before and during in vivo cells selection in s.c. growing tumors. Our results demonstrate that: (1) after in vitro transformation all cell lines (except v-src) were negative for the expression of [H2O2CA + PGE(S)] phenotype and remained equally low-tumorigenic; (2) independently of the types of genes initially transforming the cells, in vivo tumor progression was consistently leading to the replacement of parental cells by cells expressing the [H2O2CA + PGE(S)] phenotype, to 30-200 times increased tumorigenicity and less frequently to metastasizing; (3) the time necessary for selection of cells expressing this phenotype was the same (about 180 days in vivo) for all transformants, except bcl-2; the latter reaching similar values after a significant delay. Thus, common secondary src-like phenotypic cell changes, regardless of initially cell transforming genes are necessarily selected during tumor progression in vivo.
Related Concept Videos
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions
When the tumor suppressor genes develop mutations or are lost, cells start growing out of control, leading to cancer. However, a single functional copy of the tumor suppressor gene is enough for the cells to maintain their normal functions and cell...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...

