Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Good rules for cervical cytologic sampling]

P R Broso1, C Garrone

  • 1Divisione di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Ospedale di Asti (USL 19).

Minerva Ginecologica
|February 14, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MRI Findings in Patients with Clinical Onset Consistent with Infantile Neuroaxonal Dystrophy (INAD), Literature Review, Clinical and MRI Follow-up.

The neuroradiology journal·2013
Same author

Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

The British journal of surgery·2006
Same author

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study.

Surgical endoscopy·2005
Same author

Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Surgical endoscopy·2005
Same author

[Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in multiple endocrine tumors, in secreting and non-secreting lesions].

Minerva chirurgica·2004
Same author

Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study.

Surgical endoscopy·2003
Same journal

High grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive biopsy: the importance of accurate pre-operative workup.

Minerva ginecologica·2021
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of a novel vaginal medical device in recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a multicenter clinical trial.

Minerva ginecologica·2020
Same journal

[Advisory Board Italiano sulla sindrome dell'ovaio policistico (PCOS): dalle osservazioni all'esperienze cliniche sull'uso del mioinositolo (MYO) e dell'acido alfa-lipoico (ALA) per migliorare i quadri della sindrome].

Minerva ginecologica·2020
Same journal

Update on new imaging technologies in sentinel node detection.

Minerva ginecologica·2020
Same journal

Postoperative pelvic dysfunctions associated with the reconstruction of the pelvic floor.

Minerva ginecologica·2020
Same journal

The role of sentinel-node biopsy in ovarian cancer.

Minerva ginecologica·2020
See all related articles

Optimizing cervical cytology sampling requires addressing several methodological issues. Adherence to precise techniques and rules is crucial for accurate Papanicolaou smear results, impacting patient diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic pathology
  • Cytopathology techniques
  • Cervical cancer screening

Context:

  • Cervical cytology sampling, including the Papanicolaou smear, faces persistent methodological challenges.
  • Standardization of techniques is essential for reliable diagnostic accuracy.
  • Patient-related factors and procedural nuances require careful consideration.

Purpose:

  • To identify and discuss critical issues and potential risks associated with cervical cytology sampling methods.
  • To explore optimal timing and pre-sampling protocols for Papanicolaou smears.
  • To clarify best practices for sample collection, slide preparation, and interpretation.

Summary:

  • The Papanicolaou smear technique, while simple, demands precise manual skill and strict adherence to specific protocols.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Key variables include optimal sampling day, pre-sampling abstinence from sexual relations and douching, and mucus removal.
  • Standardization of slide fixation, repeat sampling locations, and interpretation of contaminants like parasites are also discussed.

    • Impact:

    • Improving the quality of cervical cytology sampling directly enhances the reliability of diagnostic results.
    • Addressing methodological inconsistencies can reduce false-negative rates and improve early detection of cervical abnormalities.
    • Standardized training and adherence to best practices are vital for effective cervical cancer screening programs.