Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
Published on: March 17, 2019
Prolonged P300 latency in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder predicts poor response to imipramine
J M Sangal1, R B Sangal, B Persky
1Attention Disorders Institute, Troy, MI 48098, USA.
Insights
P300 brainwave patterns can classify attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) into three groups. This classification helps predict treatment response to medications like pemoline and imipramine.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Psychiatry
Background:
- Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder affecting attention and information processing.
- Cognitive evoked potentials, specifically the P300, offer insights into these cognitive functions.
- Understanding P300 characteristics may aid in classifying ADHD and predicting treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To classify attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using auditory and visual P300 topography.
- To identify predictors of treatment response for ADHD medications.
- To differentiate ADHD patient subgroups based on P300 metrics and medication efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Utilized auditory and visual P300 electroencephalography (EEG) with 31 scalp electrodes.
- Analyzed P300 topography and latency in ADHD children (ages 6-15) before and after treatment.
- Compared P300 measures between good and poor responders to pemoline and imipramine.
Main Results:
- Poor imipramine responders exhibited longer auditory and visual P300 latencies compared to good responders.
- Imipramine treatment led to decreased auditory P300 latencies and increased amplitudes.
- Previously, small right frontocentral auditory P300 amplitudes predicted poor pemoline response.
Conclusions:
- P300 topography and latency can classify ADHD into three distinct groups based on treatment response.
- Group 1: Normal P300, good pemoline response.
- Group 2: Small right frontocentral auditory P300, poor pemoline response, good imipramine response.
- Group 3: Long P300 latencies and small right frontocentral auditory P300, poor response to both medications.
Abstract:
P300 is a cognitive evoked potential that evaluates attention and information processing. This study uses auditory and visual P300 topography to develop a classification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and find predictors of treatment response. Of 45 ADHD children ages 6 to 15 treated with pemoline in a previous study, 25 were poor responders. Of these 25, 17 participated in an imipramine treatment protocol. Auditory and visual P300 testing was performed before and after treatment using 31 scalp electrodes. Good and poor responders to imipramine were clinically identical. Poor imipramine responders had longer auditory and visual P300 latencies than good responders. Treatment with imipramine decreased auditory P300 latencies and increased auditory P300 amplitudes. We have previously reported that ADHD patients with small right frontocentral auditory P300 amplitudes respond poorly to pemoline. Thus, P300 topography and latency classifies ADHD into three groups: group 1 with normal P300 topography, and good response to pemoline; group 2 with small right frontocentral auditory P300 amplitudes, poor response to pemoline, and good response to imipramine; and group 3 with long auditory and visual P300 latencies and small right frontocentral auditory P300 amplitudes, and poor response to pemoline and imipramine.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
10:02Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Published on: March 12, 2020