Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events

C Hirsch1, A Mathews

  • 1MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, U.K.

Behaviour Research and Therapy
|February 18, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep Electric Field Predictions by Drift-Reduced Braginskii Theory with Plasma-Neutral Interactions Based on Experimental Images of Boundary Turbulence.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Vodka-assisted extraction.

British dental journal·2022
Same author

Depression, anxiety and PTSD symptoms before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

Psychological medicine·2022
Same author

Deep modeling of plasma and neutral fluctuations from gas puff turbulence imaging.

The Review of scientific instruments·2022
Same author

Uncovering turbulent plasma dynamics via deep learning from partial observations.

Physical review. E·2021
Same author

Distressing psychotic-like experiences, cognitive functioning and early developmental markers in clinically referred young people aged 8-18 years.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2021
Same journal

The impact of the Memory Support Intervention on therapist memory for treatment contents.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same journal

Dismantling the mechanism of VR self-compassion training: A two-session controlled trial with active controls.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same journal

Supporting children on therapy waitlists: A randomized controlled trial of a web-based parent-focused single session intervention for child anxiety.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same journal

Examining the roles of biased expectancies and weighting of valenced information in trait anxiety-linked state affect when approaching potentially stressful future events.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same journal

Problem-solving therapy versus supportive psychotherapy for Veterans with moderate suicide risk and chronic pain: A pilot randomized clinical trial.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same journal

A meta-analysis of cognitive behavioral therapy for substance use disorder: Treatment effects by comparator type and consumption and psychosocial outcomes.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
See all related articles

Individuals with high anxiety interpret ambiguous job interview scenarios negatively, while less anxious individuals infer positive outcomes. This suggests cognitive biases may maintain anxiety in real-life situations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Anxiety is often associated with biased information processing.
  • Interpretive biases may play a role in the maintenance of anxiety disorders.
  • Ambiguous social situations, like job interviews, are common triggers for anxiety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how anxiety levels influence interpretations of ambiguous social events.
  • To determine if individuals with high or low anxiety make emotionally congruent inferences.
  • To explore the cognitive mechanisms underlying anxiety maintenance.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted.
  • Participants with varying levels of interview anxiety read descriptions of an ambiguously threatening event (job interview).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Interpretive inferences made by participants were recorded and analyzed.
  • Main Results:

    • Evidence supported the hypothesis that anxiety levels influence interpretations.
    • Non-anxious individuals inferred positive outcomes to the ambiguous event.
    • Highly anxious individuals did not infer positive outcomes, suggesting a negative bias.

    Conclusions:

    • Cognitive interpretation biases differ based on anxiety levels.
    • Non-anxious individuals exhibit a positive interpretive bias in ambiguous threat situations.
    • These findings have implications for understanding and potentially treating anxiety through cognitive interventions.